Seems to rely a lot on their meta. Since I'm unfamiliar with it, I'm not going to stress over it too much, especially since they were subbed out. I'll keep my vote on my policy lynch until something comes along.
But the key take away was that they literally did a 360 in wanting someone on the council to being perfectly fine with lynching that same person just because someone made a case, even tho the person that made the case was the same person she also pressured to role claim. How is that meta related? it's just suspicious flat out
There's no shortage of suspects so there's no need to be formal, suggestions are good but I don't wanna get held to a confined set of players as that kinda defeats the purpose.
yes but moving into the game it might be punishing to give council free rein. So I would prefer to have some checks and balances in place. This is just my opinion though and I get what you are saying even if I donβt agree fully
yes but moving into the game it might be punishing to give council free rein. So I would prefer to have some checks and balances in place. This is just my opinion though and I get what you are saying even if I donβt agree fully
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.