Uh, not exactly. My information is a direct byproduct of conditions being met, think of it like cause and effect. Someone joins my chat, I learn their role name. If further conditions are met, I learn their role. This is all dealt with passively - I submit no action and as a result this "investigation" is not affected by blocks or redirects or manipulation. With Ekko not being in this chat, not only did that fail, but so did me learning his role name.
Apology accepted. Just letting you know that you can talk normally to your leader. She's not the kind of person who only understands you when you're using such language. If things get frustrating just say "Let's talk more later" and refrain from engaging in an argument further. Your leader will understand and postpone further discussion. Or just ignore her for a while like she does to Ekko at times.
And this is a dumb criticism for as long as you are insisting you are sincere in having info, because then I would be correct in assuming you're not making some play. By all means, admit that you're bullshitting and I'll take being wrong.
Sure I have, my point is I'm not exactly a stranger to making illogical plays, either. I don't feel the need to admit anything, I either did or I didn't.
Apology accepted. Just letting you know that you can talk normally to your leader. She's not the kind of person who only understands you when you're using such language. If things get frustrating just say "Let's talk more later" and refrain from engaging in an argument further. Your leader will understand and postpone further discussion. Or just ignore her for a while like she does to Ekko at times.
Sure I have, my point is I'm not exactly a stranger to making illogical plays, either. I don't feel the need to admit anything, I either did or I didn't.
Apology accepted. Just letting you know that you can talk normally to your leader. She's not the kind of person who only understands you when you're using such language. If things get frustrating just say "Let's talk more later" and refrain from engaging in an argument further. Your leader will understand and postpone further discussion. Or just ignore her for a while like she does to Ekko at times.
Sure I have, my point is I'm not exactly a stranger to making illogical plays, either. I don't feel the need to admit anything, I either did or I didn't.
ratchet and michelle reaction to him, looked like michelle was throwing weak excuse, so this made me think ratchet leans more null/town grounds while michelle looks worse
I know they can. But I don't see them actually doing it. Per Zemmi's words she'd have been notified of having been shot at, and with Michelle saying she protected Zemmi I am inclined to take it as a townie action. Chances very high Zemmi would be shot and no scum would want to save her.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.