[FNZ] Role Madness Game 02: The Ascent of the Space Pirates

[Reborn]

Alright. I asked @Finalbeta and he says so long as I don't give my character name or copy-paste his description (explain in my own words), I am free to do so.

My role is Explorer and I have the ability to essentially stalk someone and see what they do at night. I can give my results/findings, but if I do, I could jeopardize other town members.

Alright. I asked @Finalbeta and he says so long as I don't give my character name or copy-paste his description (explain in my own words), I am free to do so.

My role is Explorer and I have the ability to essentially stalk someone and see what they do at night. I can give my results/findings, but if I do, I could jeopardize other town members.

How can we be sure it's not a fake claim to save yourself when things aren't looking good for you?

I mean is there anything to prove that you are what you said?

Frank speaking, we already lost four townie and one more mislynch and we will be doomed...so explain why I shouldn't think this as a tactic to save yourself and ensure that you don't get eliminated?

 

[TheAncientCenturion]

How can we be sure it's not a fake claim to save yourself when things aren't looking good for you?

I mean is there anything to prove that you are what you said?

Frank speaking, we already lost four townie and one more mislynch and we will be doomed...so explain why I shouldn't think this as a tactic to save yourself and ensure that you don't get eliminated?

I can give you my reports and you can see for yourselves, or, whenever @AL sama or @Finalbeta come on I have one other way of verifying myself.

 

[Dragomir]

Why tac?

Already thought of him as scum so was just down to him and her.

 

[Dragomir]

@TheAncientCenturion can you elaborate more on seeing what the action of your target does? Do you see who they targeted and what the ability that they used that night does?

Also, give us your targets from N1 and N2. No need for results.

 

[TheAncientCenturion]

@TheAncientCenturion can you elaborate more on seeing what the action of your target does? Do you see who they targeted and what the ability that they used that night does?

Also, give us your targets from N1 and N2. No need for results.

So; HYPOTHETICAL EXAMPLE.

If Bogard were playing, and Bogard was the Town Investigator, I could target him.

If Bogard decided to Investigate Rej, I would be told that Bogard investigated Rej. Anything happening to Bogard won't register.

D1. Denim
D2. Kiwipom

 

[Dragomir]

If it's not TAC, then it's Kiwi. I have a hard time believing that Reborn and Law are scum due to the incredible effort they've put forth into this game with how they have dissected each post and questioned multiple people. That's very hard to fake.

I'm also thinking TAC is town, his role explains--if I'm understanding it correctly--would explain the strong town read he has on me that.

So again, Kiwi and Celestia. Please, let's all use process of elimination to find the remaining scum.

 

[Reborn]

I can give you my reports and you can see for yourselves, or, whenever @AL sama or @Finalbeta come on I have one other way of verifying myself.

Sure if you think you have a way to prove what you claimed is true without jeopardizing townie then I want to see that...and if it's look legit then you are twonie and I will believe you...

Oh I saw your next post. So on D2 night you explorered kiwi and now you think kiwi could be scum?


Now, @Kiwipom why you sus tac?

And, @Denim you had nothing on tac before this but suddenly you said it's down to tac and Celestia? Isn't this too opportunistic on your side?

You voted Celestia in d2 but when things turned against me and NW, you flipped against us branding us scum partner and unvoted Celestia and voted NW out.

And, once again when tac said he over reacted against me and I look townie,you changed in my favor saying that you don't think I am scum...but this time tide was against tac and you pushed for tac now.. isn't this too opportunistic behavior on your part?

 

[Dragomir]

So; HYPOTHETICAL EXAMPLE.

If Bogard were playing, and Bogard was the Town Investigator, I could target him.

If Bogard decided to Investigate Rej, I would be told that Bogard investigated Rej. Anything happening to Bogard won't register.

D1. Denim
D2. Kiwipom

Oh, yes sir you are town. 100%

You know what I did N1, you would have killed me if you weren't town.

What did Kiwi do?

 

[TheAncientCenturion]

If you want me to go much further into it, I'm afraid that I'll have to reveal info on Kiwi / Denim that could get people killed. We are without a doctor, so the odds of us being saved are low.

 

[Reborn]

If you want me to go much further into it, I'm afraid that I'll have to reveal info on Kiwi / Denim that could get people killed. We are without a doctor, so the odds of us being saved are low.

No need..you are townie.

 

[TheAncientCenturion]

Oh, yes sir you are town. 100%

You know what I did N1, you would have killed me if you weren't town.

What did Kiwi do?

Nothing. And IIRC, we're all power roles.

 

[Dragomir]

Sure if you think you have a way to prove what you claimed is true without jeopardizing townie then I want to see that...and if it's look legit then you are twonie and I will believe you...

Oh I saw your next post. So on D2 night you explorered kiwi and now you think kiwi could be scum?


Now, @Kiwipom why you sus tac?

And, @Denim you had nothing on tac before this but suddenly you said it's down to tac and Celestia? Isn't this too opportunistic on your side?

You voted Celestia in d2 but when things turned against me and NW, you flipped against us branding us scum partner and unvoted Celestia and voted NW out.

And, once again when tac said he over reacted against me and I look townie,you changed in my favor saying that you don't think I am scum...but this time tide was against tac and you pushed for tac now.. isn't this too opportunistic behavior on your part?

The reason why I said you were scum was because I thought that you and NW could be buddies. But since NW flipped town, there's no reason for me to push that assertion so I decided to go back to my former read until further notice.

 

[Law]

So based on evidence, TAC is clean, very good. I am inclined to believe the claim

 

[Dragomir]

@Kiwipom why did you do nothing?

 

[Dragomir]

So based on evidence, TAC is clean, very good. I am inclined to believe the claim

Are you doing process of elimination? If not, please do. Tell me your town reads and who you still aren't sure about. It will help a lot.

 

[Kiwipom]

Now, @Kiwipom why you sus tac?

I said he was suspicious because he started the suspicion on Neutralwatcher and said it was me who started it. I know I backed it up with evidences, but I didn't like that he dismissed his initial suspicion as if trying to evade the blame.

But he already addressed the issue

 

[Kiwipom]

@Kiwipom why did you do nothing?

yeah I did nothing

 

[Dragomir]

yeah I did nothing

Ok, but why? What is your role?

 

[Reborn]

The reason why I said you were scum was because I thought that you and NW could be buddies. But since NW flipped town, there's no reason for me to push that assertion so I decided to go back to my former read until further notice.

But now you pushed the case on kiwi...

Man, you are totally not consistent with your sus...its keep on changing.

And, let me quote your own post in this regard and on the basis of which you pushed vote on Celestia

Yes, you hit perfectly.

I disagree. Being open and creating salads for players you can suspect gives scum a lot more leeway with how they push a player. If their initial read fails and that person is proven to be town or it just doesn't pick up a wagon, they can jump back to others and continue "contributing".

It's a lot more effective than just pushing one player or none at all. And more likely than not, scum will have a popular suspicion in their salad so in the very case that player is getting voted, they can jump in without too much trouble. Player salads effectively allow scum to blend in easier.

Look at the highlighted part... aren't you doing the same?

 

[Reborn]

I said he was suspicious because he started the suspicion on Neutralwatcher and said it was me who started it. I know I backed it up with evidences, but I didn't like that he dismissed his initial suspicion as if trying to evade the blame.

But he already addressed the issue

So whom you sus now?