[FNZ] Role Madness Game 02: The Ascent of the Space Pirates

[Reborn]

Because you do a very good job of making yourself seem suspicious with your posts lmao. What else am I supposed to say? The quality of Law's posts are very high and I'm convinced he's town. It's you, Kiwi or Celestia IMO, and Celestia seems the most likely.

This is utter BS...

You do know the more you post,the likely hood of making mistakes increases and more difficult it is to fake...

I have posted the maximum on this thread..invesitagted the maximum...was most engaged...was most active...was even cautious of nw lynch...yet you guys have nothing on me... nothing...no concrete evidence that I am sus...

do you think if I was Mafia then I could have faked this much with such activity considering that this is fukn my only third mafia game??? Your argument is utter BS....

 

[Dragomir]

ok fine, I still don’t think Celestia is scum but I’m ok with waiting for Law to claim tomorrow

but since we’re saying Celestia vs Reborn, why did we choose Celestia over Reborn?

No, better he just claim now so we get things over with. You should too tbh.

@Law claim your abilities.

 

[Dragomir]

This is utter BS...

You do know the more you post,the likely hood of making mistakes increases and more difficult it is to fake...

I have posted the maximum on this thread..invesitagted the maximum...was most engaged...was most active...was even cautious of nw lynch...yet you guys have nothing on me... nothing...no concrete evidence that I am sus...

do you think if I was Mafia then I could have faked this much with such activity considering that this is fukn my only third mafia game??? Your argument is utter BS....

Only TAC is saying you're sus dude. I still believe you're town for the same reasons i think Law is scum.

Also, can you please give out your town reads?

 

[Law]

Only TAC is saying you're sus dude. I still believe you're town for the same reasons i think Law is scum.

I am town.
I would like to wait for the host for the claim confirmation. I think we are only allowed one claim a phase and TAC made a claim.

 

[Finalbeta]

@Finalbeta is their no restrictions on how many can claim?

No restriction but you must follow the rules

 

[Reborn]

No restriction but you must follow the rules

Let me ask you one question..


This is what rules say

Claiming - claiming is allowed in this game, but we will restrict it to describing your abilities alone and nothing else (in your own words moreover), each additional claim will result in a modkill


So if their is no restrictions on how many can can claim then does it mean there is no guarantee whether a claim is true or not?

Because rule say we can't copy paste our abilities and must describe in our own words.. which means claim can be faked and so my question is there is absolutely no way to confirm that claim made is true?

 

[Finalbeta]

Let me ask you one question..


This is what rules say

Claiming - claiming is allowed in this game, but we will restrict it to describing your abilities alone and nothing else (in your own words moreover), each additional claim will result in a modkill


So if their is no restrictions on how many can can claim then does it mean there is no guarantee whether a claim is true or not?

Because rule say we can't copy paste our abilities and must describe in our own words.. which means claim can be faked and so my question is there is absolutely no way to confirm that claim made is true?

Yes role claims can eventually be faked or doubled and you never know for sure which is real and which is not. It's a pure matter of game skill and wit.

 

[Reborn]

Yes role claims can eventually be faked or doubled and you never know for sure which is real and which is not. It's a pure matter of game skill and wit.

Thank you for clarifying...

 

[Finalbeta]

Host note:

A message appears from far far away: TAC is Town
​

@TheAncientCenturion
@Law
@Denim
@Celestia
@Kiwipom
@Reborn

 

[TheAncientCenturion]

Just so no one tries to say I'm faking. I had that one time ability up my sleeve, and seeing as how I'm on the chopping block to go...

 

[Reborn]

Only TAC is saying you're sus dude. I still believe you're town for the same reasons i think Law is scum.

Also, can you please give out your town reads?

Except for tac due to his claim I sus everyone...

I can give you reasons why I think so if you interested

 

[Dragomir]

Except for tac due to his claim I sus everyone...

I can give you reasons why I think so if you interested

Sure.

 

[Dragomir]

Still confident that it's Kiwi and Celestia. If not Kiwi then Law. Rest are lock town for me. Celestia must go first.

 

[Reborn]

Sure.

Okay...


Denim- I read all your post made so far twice....believe me. the reason I sus you is that you jumped on Celestia on dayone prematurely and that two twice- first right at the beginning and second after she said she is going to sleep and then casted vote on her.

Its was only on day two Celestia started arguing with you clearly not prior to that...even her vote on day1 was not against you.

now what you did can make sense to you because you are experience player but you have to understand that I am not experienced to understand such game play...so I am seeing things from my perspective and limited experience and what you did doesn't make sense to me because I find it too opportunistic just like you switched to nw and me then kiwi and law.....

Moving on to your earlier question that why I am not believing tac words on you? Because this is my third game with him and he caused more mislynches than right Lynch. He reads aren't so good and are backed by only his narratives and lacks solid case build up...

This is why I called his bs out when he put sus on me but not law despite I did more than law on every front....it was blatant hyprocrisy and then he wonders why I don't believe his argument. Infact what he overlooked is that from beginning of this day 3 I Never casued sus on him despite him acting as a hindrance yesterday

Law and kiwi- seem to me like they buddied... especially the way they build up the case on NW... infact, in my argument with tac on day 2 I did say that I want to look into denim and Celestia because there is no guarantee that nw is scum and it could be possible that mafia set up nw Lynch...but once again tac acted emotionally than rationally

Celestia- I agree with some of your reasons on her but not completely. However, the reason I believe made me cause vote on her... however, you have to understand that you really didn't put up the case on Celestia well thus the confusion. You are the most experience player and a townie yet I didn't see you playing like that...so you can't blame me, a newb playing his third game Why I am not on same boat as you....

 

[Kiwipom]

This is what I am saying.

Celestia- I agree with some of your reasons on her but not completely. However, the reason I believe made me cause vote on her... however, you have to understand that you really didn't put up the case on Celestia well thus the confusion. You are the most experience player and a townie yet I didn't see you playing like that...so you can't blame me, a newb playing his third game Why I am not on same boat as you....

I don't see a case build up against Celestia so I don't understand why we are voting her

 

[Dragomir]

Okay...


Denim- I read all your post made so far twice....believe me. the reason I sus you is that you jumped on Celestia on dayone prematurely and that two twice- first right at the beginning and second after she said she is going to sleep and then casted vote on her.

Its was only on day two Celestia started arguing with you clearly not prior to that...even her vote on day1 was not against you.

now what you did can make sense to you because you are experience player but you have to understand that I am not experienced to understand such game play...so I am seeing things from my perspective and limited experience and what you did doesn't make sense to me because I find it too opportunistic just like you switched to nw and me then kiwi and law.....

Moving on to your earlier question that why I am not believing tac words on you? Because this is my third game with him and he caused more mislynches than right Lynch. He reads aren't so good and are backed by only his narratives and lacks solid case build up...

This is why I called his bs out when he put sus on me but not law despite I did more than law on every front....it was blatant hyprocrisy and then he wonders why I don't believe his argument. Infact what he overlooked is that from beginning of this day 3 I Never casued sus on him despite him acting as a hindrance yesterday

Law and kiwi- seem to me like they buddied... especially the way they build up the case on NW... infact, in my argument with tac on day 2 I did say that I want to look into denim and Celestia because there is no guarantee that nw is scum and it could be possible that mafia set up nw Lynch...but once again tac acted emotionally than rationally

Celestia- I agree with some of your reasons on her but not completely. However, the reason I believe made me cause vote on her... however, you have to understand that you really didn't put up the case on Celestia well thus the confusion. You are the most experience player and a townie yet I didn't see you playing like that...so you can't blame me, a newb playing his third game Why I am not on same boat as you....

Me voting for her after she went to sleep is irrelevant. It's such a bad reason to use against someone generally doesn't mean anything. Now, you are novice so I understand why you might think the timing of it was bad but believe me it's not. There's no reason for why I should wait until she wakes up before I vote for her. It'd make no difference it I do before or after and I'm.not going to wait 7-8 hrs. Not like I know what time it is where she's at and was like "ooh, let me wait till she sleeps before voting for her". Nobody does that.

 

[Dragomir]

This is what I am saying.

I don't see a case build up against Celestia so I don't understand why we are voting her

If you want a proper case so badly, I'll make you one. Hold up. I won't even bring up the player salad, just everything from my argument with her.

 

[Kiwipom]

If you want a proper case so badly, I'll make you one. Hold up. I won't even bring up the player salad, just everything from my argument with her.

ok, thank you

 

[Reborn]

Me voting for her after she went to sleep is irrelevant.

You didn't understand what I said...

You first jumped on both rej and Celestia prematurely...

Then when she went offline....you casted vote on that same prematurely decided reasons along with a new word "salad nana"..

This is what is off..... their was no build up of a case but just your hunch based on your experience...

So how can you expect us to catch that?

I even gave you the opportunity right at the beginning of day3 to build a case on her with solid argument.... but you didn't. If you are twonie and at the top an experience player then why you didn't you build a strong case to guide us.......you really didn't play like an experienced townie if you are one....

There is no case on Celestia build by you...not on day 1..and day 2 is all arguments which lead us to nothing....

 

[Kiwipom]

can someone explain to me what does player salad mean?