id argue since rott/pero are likely both just town, then there is a big chance that mafia was not in their wagons. like u will only find very few mafia in rott/pero's wagons
zolo's lynch came out of nowhere. mafia did not have time to react to it and grow the counter wagons. this resulted in most of zolo's voters being town, while also most of pero/rott voters r townish. mafia were voting elsewhere/inactive.
that whole narrative of coutner wagon doesnt make sense here ~♡
counter implies we actually had a scum wagon going, then mafia moved it to a town and then we finally lynched the scum.
here both wagons were likely towny (rott and pero). there was no scum driving anything. it was town going for a classic day 1 mislynch, until fuji proposed the zolo cfd, and then the same townies that were on rott/pero moved to zolo before mafia could react
my point is we are focusing on the pero/rott voters more than we should. cfd's are hard to wagonometry because scum is caught offguard. thats the whole point of cfd. and since they are caught offguard you can't make very solid outcome reads out of the wagons. you can try but it will be very messy.
i'd rather we stick to the good old threadplay scum reads. it worked day 1 and it will work again here.
i propose we start with yo tan and gambit. any others r welcomed ~♡