"Easily"? I'm not sure about that. And some of what @Sadistic Senpai either contradicts facts in the manga, or just doesn't make any sense. Such as him claiming that Jack had Raizou's vivre card, or that Kanjuro sabotaged the ship, when it was revealed that the cause was due to a crash as a result of their sailing inexperience.
I believe Kanjuro is the traitor, but Oda's been messy in this whole plot.
It was clearly established that Kanjuro didn't know Raizou was on Zou. The last he saw of Raizou, he was on a broken raft in the naturally treacherous reverse sea currents nearby Zou. Yet, despite the fact that it was highly probable Raizou could've died on the way, Kanjuro apparently reported to Kaido that Raizou had arrived on Zou.
Jack didn't just think that Raizou might be on Zou. He knew Raizou was on Zou, which is knowledge Kanjuro never had and was only available to the minks who witnessed him arrive.
Not only that, by the time of Raizou crash landing at Zou, Kanjuro was already fully aware of the meaning of the crescent moon ankle mark. He knew that it was a symbol of the rebellion since he'd been told that from before they even left Wano. So why did Kanjuro hold knowledge of exactly who the rebels were in Wano if he was the traitor? Why would he not inform Orochi so they can round them up? Not only that, but throughout the entire time Luffy and co were on WCI, Kanjuro was undercover on Wano with the alliance. He knew what everyone was doing. He knew Robin was training to infiltrate Orochi's castle. He knew Zoro and Usopp were recruiting. Yet no information or anything got leaked in this time. The leaks started happening shortly after all of this information that Kanjuro had already long known, started to get revealed to the WCI group.
So Kanjuro reported to Kaido the location where there was a chance Raizou could be, but didn't mention anything about the rebel symbol at Wano for weeks, despite knowing about that before the Raizou situation?
No they don't. They all have arguments against them. Kanjuro has just as many.
-What about the countless panels of him crying alongside the other scabbards and speech of what must be done, totally in sync with the rest of them.
-What about him rallying Luffy to join them and fight?
There is absolutely no benefit to encouraging Luffy to help them after seeing how strong Luffy was in Dressrosa. Someone strong enough to one-shot him. Not to mention his grand fleet which Kanjuro witnessed being formed and the strength of his crew.
-What about the prophecy of 9 ghosts killing Orochi?
-What about the fact that Kanjuro has known the other scabbards since he was a kid and has guarded Momo?
-What about the inconsistency of the timeline of leaked info?
-What about Kanjuro rushing to Oden castle as it burned down to protect the Kozukis?
I think the traitor is Kanjuro, but there is a lot doesn't make sense, so I'm doubtful Oda can justify things upon the reveal.
I believe Kanjuro is the traitor, but Oda's been messy in this whole plot.
Jack didn't just think that Raizou might be on Zou. He knew Raizou was on Zou, which is knowledge Kanjuro never had and was only available to the minks who witnessed him arrive.
Not only that, by the time of Raizou crash landing at Zou, Kanjuro was already fully aware of the meaning of the crescent moon ankle mark. He knew that it was a symbol of the rebellion since he'd been told that from before they even left Wano. So why did Kanjuro hold knowledge of exactly who the rebels were in Wano if he was the traitor? Why would he not inform Orochi so they can round them up? Not only that, but throughout the entire time Luffy and co were on WCI, Kanjuro was undercover on Wano with the alliance. He knew what everyone was doing. He knew Robin was training to infiltrate Orochi's castle. He knew Zoro and Usopp were recruiting. Yet no information or anything got leaked in this time. The leaks started happening shortly after all of this information that Kanjuro had already long known, started to get revealed to the WCI group.
So Kanjuro reported to Kaido the location where there was a chance Raizou could be, but didn't mention anything about the rebel symbol at Wano for weeks, despite knowing about that before the Raizou situation?
No they don't. They all have arguments against them. Kanjuro has just as many.
-What about the countless panels of him crying alongside the other scabbards and speech of what must be done, totally in sync with the rest of them.
-What about him rallying Luffy to join them and fight?
-What about the prophecy of 9 ghosts killing Orochi?
-What about the fact that Kanjuro has known the other scabbards since he was a kid and has guarded Momo?
-What about the inconsistency of the timeline of leaked info?
-What about Kanjuro rushing to Oden castle as it burned down to protect the Kozukis?
I think the traitor is Kanjuro, but there is a lot doesn't make sense, so I'm doubtful Oda can justify things upon the reveal.
