Yes he is. Feats don't mean shit. Portrayal is all that matters. Laughing emojis won't help either.
If you have an Admiral rank and title. You're equal to the other two next to you. That's what the story portrays and if don't agree with it the burden of proof lies on you to prove us wrong.
Yes he is. Feats don't mean shit. Portrayal is all that matters. Laughing emojis won't help either.
If you have an Admiral rank and title. You're equal to the other two next to you. That's what the story portrays and if don't agree with it the burden of proof lies on you to prove us wrong.
You can be a monster and not be as strong as the OG trio. Even Magellan was considered a monster.
I just don't gift feats. No need to believe Greenbull can hold a top tier like WB. In fact every reason to believe he cannot from these spoilers
There is nothing which places them below OG trio canonically. Magellan is not an admiral, so irrelevant.
Aramaki destroyed King and Queen whilst Kizaru struggled against Marco. Now where's your feat argument again? And why can't Aramaki injure Sickbeard on a single occasion like Kizaru?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.