Break Week Kaido was wrong about Doffy
- Thread starter griffindidnuthinwrong
- Start date
And I'm asking how did you come up with these tiers?
What did King show that he would somehow do better than Cracker or Queen?
How is Katakuri that much higher than Cracker? DId Cracker not have 11 hour fight vs Luffy & Nami, the same amount of hours that Katakuri fought just 1 Luffy who did not negate his abilities unlike Nami did?
Do you also think there is such a thing as Admiral 1 > Admiral 2 > Admiral 3?
What did King show that he would somehow do better than Cracker or Queen?
How is Katakuri that much higher than Cracker? DId Cracker not have 11 hour fight vs Luffy & Nami, the same amount of hours that Katakuri fought just 1 Luffy who did not negate his abilities unlike Nami did?
Do you also think there is such a thing as Admiral 1 > Admiral 2 > Admiral 3?
Admirals are all even, Katakuri legit has statements and hype as strongest sweet commander, we legit see him with CoC,great CoA,insane CoO(Future sight) and at top awakening with his spear as weapon. He ragdolled Boundman, something which even Cracker couldn´t.
Queen himself hyped King, we see feats in compare and see how crazy King feats been.
Im not saying that King can trash Queen, they are around the same league, but the ranking is clean for me:
King>Queen>Cracker>Doffy.
Isn´t your ranking similar to this?
Queen himself hyped King, we see feats in compare and see how crazy King feats been.
Im not saying that King can trash Queen, they are around the same league, but the ranking is clean for me:
King>Queen>Cracker>Doffy.
Isn´t your ranking similar to this?
And how did you arrive to that conclusion?
How did Akainu beat Aokiji if they are all even?
Yeah, being strongest=/= leagues/tiers ahead of anyone in the same rank. Sameway there is the strongest Admiral, doesn't mean they aren't all in the same tier
And yet he fought Luffy just as long as Cracker did, when Cracker had his power nullified by Nami while Katakuri had his powers working fine.
Yeah, instead Cracker fought multiple people at the same time while having his power nulified and without ever getting hurt by boundman unlike Katakuri.
...and? Queen hyped Jack too. What does that prove?
The fuck? What feats he has over others?
So if they are in the same league, how the fuck is there such a big difference in diffulty in beating Doffy? That's like saying every admiral would somehow need different difficulty to beat an opponent.
Sure, it would be the same with admirals, that doesn't mean they aren't in the same tier. That's just showing who's stronger than who and not who is stronger than who by how much.
How did Akainu beat Aokiji if they are all even?
Yeah, being strongest=/= leagues/tiers ahead of anyone in the same rank. Sameway there is the strongest Admiral, doesn't mean they aren't all in the same tier
And yet he fought Luffy just as long as Cracker did, when Cracker had his power nullified by Nami while Katakuri had his powers working fine.
Yeah, instead Cracker fought multiple people at the same time while having his power nulified and without ever getting hurt by boundman unlike Katakuri.
...and? Queen hyped Jack too. What does that prove?
The fuck? What feats he has over others?
So if they are in the same league, how the fuck is there such a big difference in diffulty in beating Doffy? That's like saying every admiral would somehow need different difficulty to beat an opponent.
Sure, it would be the same with admirals, that doesn't mean they aren't in the same tier. That's just showing who's stronger than who and not who is stronger than who by how much.
In a extrem high diff battle after 10days, isn´t that even?
I don´t say they aren´t same tier, the one is a high tier, the another a high high tier, the gap is not large but still Katakuri is stronger than Cracker.
Cracker fought a weaker Luffy version, Luffy with FS was ragdolled by Katakuri, even with Boundman.
The portrayal is clear here...
Katakuri wouldn´t get hurt either if he didn´t lose his controll.
Fact is that Katakuri was to much for Luffy, only with FS and growing stronger during the battle, he won.
Not in the same way as he did with King.
His heal power, all over his lunarian power, Haki feat and an strong final attack.
He has speedfeats, better Ap feats, better physical feats, better range feats, better aoe feats.
Do you want more?
Even thought they are all high tiers, we have still sub tiers in that category.
Or do you compare someone like Katakuri with someone like Cracker?
We had two admirals facing each other and battle of in a extrem high diff battle, when we had the same for two commanders?
Luffy who was Cracker lvl, was ragdolled by Katakuri, Zoro was the same, both only won in the end with an powerup.
I don´t say they aren´t same tier, the one is a high tier, the another a high high tier, the gap is not large but still Katakuri is stronger than Cracker.
Cracker fought a weaker Luffy version, Luffy with FS was ragdolled by Katakuri, even with Boundman.
The portrayal is clear here...
Katakuri wouldn´t get hurt either if he didn´t lose his controll.
Fact is that Katakuri was to much for Luffy, only with FS and growing stronger during the battle, he won.
Not in the same way as he did with King.
His heal power, all over his lunarian power, Haki feat and an strong final attack.
He has speedfeats, better Ap feats, better physical feats, better range feats, better aoe feats.
Do you want more?
Even thought they are all high tiers, we have still sub tiers in that category.
Or do you compare someone like Katakuri with someone like Cracker?
We had two admirals facing each other and battle of in a extrem high diff battle, when we had the same for two commanders?
Luffy who was Cracker lvl, was ragdolled by Katakuri, Zoro was the same, both only won in the end with an powerup.
