Is Mihawk more powerful than Shanks?


  • Total voters
    423
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Candybros this is what a Conqueror's haki tease/hint is, in 25 years of OP Lanji doesn't have a single hint of having CoC, take notes. First Zoro and now Nami, pray that Usopp shows something in the next chapter and maybe you'll get a little love from Oda. :myman:

What do you mean bro :suresure:

Giving CoC to characters far weaker than Sanji wont make CoC users look good at all, it undermines even more that power
 
Then why debate.

Arguments like "he must have something " are moot.
It sounds like I can accept X can be stronger Y must have something.
I think the "he must have something" arguments come from a disconnect between Shanks's feats and his portrayal. imo, shanks outright has the best feats of any character alive. From splitting the sky with WB, stopping the war, making admirals shit their pants with CoC from miles away.
Not even kaido has feats like this. However, Shanks isn't WSSM, nor is he WSC or WSM.

Here's how I think it could be reconciled
  1. Shanks is a failed Roger. He might have been PK, but sacrificed it for luffy when he gave up his arm.
  2. Shanks is going to become the WSM(or close) via a massive power up, which will also change his fighting style.
In regards to #1, Shanks has the greatest haki in OP, he just doesn't have the raw strength that Kaido and Mihawk do that make them stronger. This shows that Shanks had the potential to be PK, but he gave it up for Luffy.
 
Why are you Sanji fans so fucking stupid
It’s crazy
that's what the game says, if you can't read the fucking retarded stupid around here must be you. You also never played the game or would know that the videogame threats Shanks as the strongest character LMAO.
At least play the game before talking about it, you can say it isn't valid for manga, but that haki user and swordsman are two different thing in the game is a fucking fact.
 
The Shank wanking has gotten even worse. "Yea Mihawk is the better swordsmen but that's just a hobby for Shanks. Even though he's the 2nd strongest in the world at it he only learned to be that good on the side. He's actually has a super non sword haki fighting style that he's even better in". This would be like Luffy being just bellow Zoro in terms swordsmenship in addition to having his own DF way of fighting.
 
Strongest swordsman means strongest swordsman though. Shanks haki feats are great but they still don’t make him the strongest swordsman so he’s still weaker than Shanks. Zoro’s haki feats are better than Mihawk’s as well but he isn’t stronger than Mihawk either.
Mute point since every top tier swordsman had the best haki.

Rodger is a perfect example of this. Zoro besting mihawk means his haki that he inbues into his swordsmanship has to be stronger.

So regardless is stupid to say that shanks>mihawk. The best you can say is shanks=mihawk

To add its even more dumb when we came from a land of sworsman with their training being HAKI BASED. What made oden strong was haki. What enma (sword) wanted? Haki
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top