Is Mihawk more powerful than Shanks?


  • Total voters
    423
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Shanks has top tier haki feats, Mihawk doesn't

That's proof
Really coping so hard that you're going to ignore top tier portrayal, top tier bounty and top tier title while asking for feats for a character who hasn't had his moments to shine yet? Hell, the bounty gap between Shanks/Mihawk is same as Roger/WB and Mihawk isn't even a captain.

What's next? Rocks shit because he doesn't have on-screen feats?

Shanks is a Swordsman, if he was above Mihawk, he'd be WSS, but he's not. It's okay to accept clear-cut L, it's coping what's clownish.
 
ppl like to act like mihawk and shanks would go like roger and oden in an actual fight .
where oden is more "skilled" in swordsmanship but roger brushes him off in an actual fight cause his haki is stronger .
no one looks at this thinking oden is the more skilled swordsman .

 
Nami really has conqueror haki! Fuck oda with all his bullshit this manga full of shit this senile and degenerate old man is making fun of sanji for years why a fraudulent old woman like nami gets coc before ussop and sanji? Fuck you oda with your shitty manga one piece should have ended with akainu killing luffy and ace
Fuck u oda you mentally retarded piece of shit
1. It's a gag
2. Nami having conqueror's haki is way better than either Usopp or Sanji having it, especially that bum Usopp

Cope and seethe :ihaha:
 
Really coping so hard that you're going to ignore top tier portrayal, top tier bounty and top tier title while asking for feats for a character who hasn't had his moments to shine yet? Hell, the bounty gap between Shanks/Mihawk is same as Roger/WB and Mihawk isn't even a captain.

What's next? Rocks shit because he doesn't have on-screen feats?

Shanks is a Swordsman, if he was above Mihawk, he'd be WSS, but he's not. It's okay to accept clear-cut L, it's coping what's clownish.
The guy asked for proof and that's what feats are.

Blame Oda for giving Shanks top tier haki feats and not Mihawk:kayneshrug:
 
I think the "he must have something" arguments come from a disconnect between Shanks's feats and his portrayal. imo, shanks outright has the best feats of any character alive. From splitting the sky with WB, stopping the war, making admirals shit their pants with CoC from miles away.
Not even kaido has feats like this. However, Shanks isn't WSSM, nor is he WSC or WSM.

Here's how I think it could be reconciled
  1. Shanks is a failed Roger. He might have been PK, but sacrificed it for luffy when he gave up his arm.
  2. Shanks is going to become the WSM(or close) via a massive power up, which will also change his fighting style.
In regards to #1, Shanks has the greatest haki in OP, he just doesn't have the raw strength that Kaido and Mihawk do that make them stronger. This shows that Shanks had the potential to be PK, but he gave it up for Luffy.
Having a feeling he has something is ok.
But using such as argument is well faulty we all know that ....debates work with info at hand.

Shanks has been described as swordman several times by now so thinking he's something else without proof is kinda delusional.
aCoC and swordmanship can mix nonchalantly we have proof for days.

"He has potential" ain't an argument personally.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top