Chapter Discussion WGS title once again confirmed to be mainly ''SKILL'' based
- Thread starter Erkan12
- Start date
Refuting by saying shit panels? WSS is about who wins? So why Brannew say something about skills instead of Mihawk wins against Shanks directly? Why in real life being WSS is not invincible against someone with a bigger gun. Marco ordered Vista to go at Mihawk, while Akainu visibly respected Shanks' haki. And really you talk about haki=swordsmanship as if there is anyone in the panel confirms it.
You showed me a panel that says "haki user"... I refuted by providing you an official panel which proves it never said that. There's no such thing as a hakiman.
First, Brannew didn't talk about skills, he said swordsmanship. Second, he didn't say that's where WSS stems from. WSS is about who wins... Zoro literally wants to defeat Mihawk to get it. Is that not a fact? Or is Zoro going to turn-off his haki to skill-fight Mihawk?
Is Zoro with ACoC, ACoA and CoO going fight Mihawk using all those for WSS or not? Yes, or no.
I like how you ignored this btw:
First, Brannew didn't talk about skills, he said swordsmanship. Second, he didn't say that's where WSS stems from. WSS is about who wins... Zoro literally wants to defeat Mihawk to get it. Is that not a fact? Or is Zoro going to turn-off his haki to skill-fight Mihawk?
Is Zoro with ACoC, ACoA and CoO going fight Mihawk using all those for WSS or not? Yes, or no.
I like how you ignored this btw:
Come on, how is this even bad for Shanks? It validates what we have been saying for a while (that Mihawk has his titles because his sword skills, not necesssarily his overall power, is superior to Shanks).
Just because you don’t like Shanks, that doesn’t mean that you have to behave like a total neanderthal to slander him lol
[automerge]1661521911[/automerge]
This is just because Oda’s sword fighting choreography is total garbage, so it’s never conveyed very well what having a superior sword technique looks like. With regards to Haki, having superior sword skill would involve being able to more efficiently channel your Haki into your sword, but someone could still be stronger than you by having a larger volume of Haki
Just because you don’t like Shanks, that doesn’t mean that you have to behave like a total neanderthal to slander him lol
[automerge]1661521911[/automerge]
The funniest thing with this retarded thread, is that Zoro's development in "Sword Skills" from the start of the Post TS to now is a grand total of ZERO while all of his development has been in Haki.
Even Beetlejuice can see what it implies
Even Beetlejuice can see what it implies
Guys....
Isn't obvious from zoro that swordmanship in order to be at its best, haki is a must ?
What a swordman would be if anyone can break his sword because he has stronger haki than him?
Especially in Zoro's and Mihawk's swordmanship (power type) haki means stronger, simple as that.
Literally the strongest sword in the world is the sword that is coated with the strongest haki.
Isn't obvious from zoro that swordmanship in order to be at its best, haki is a must ?
What a swordman would be if anyone can break his sword because he has stronger haki than him?
Especially in Zoro's and Mihawk's swordmanship (power type) haki means stronger, simple as that.
Literally the strongest sword in the world is the sword that is coated with the strongest haki.
Last edited:
The funny thing is, Shanks has great CoC feats, but nothing says that Mihawk can't pull similar ones. We don't know what Mihawk is capable of with potential CoC. So arguments can be made.
However, Mihawk DOES have a haki feat that Shanks is confirmed to not be able to perform. Mihawk's CoA was good enough to make permanent black blade, Shanks' is not.
However, Mihawk DOES have a haki feat that Shanks is confirmed to not be able to perform. Mihawk's CoA was good enough to make permanent black blade, Shanks' is not.
