If he covered the battlefield with darkness, then he will have nothing to switch places with. Too bad this isn't a winter island for him to switch places with snowflakes. Law has to get close to BB to land hits, so it's easy enough to capture him without giving him enough time to react. I am not saying Law is definitely getting captured. I already explained to the folks last week how Law is one of the only DF users that could oppose BB's DF but it's not as hard to touch Law as you're making it out to be.
This is fanfic. First the battlefield is the entire island. Second BB doesn't just cover things in darkness. He sucks the things in from the ground...slowly. So I don't see where you are getting the notion that BB can cover the entire battlefield while pulling Law in.
He is helpless against BB as long as he doesn't have access to his DF abilities. There is nothing he could do against GGnM without his fruit. His only option is BB acting careless, and not attacking Law.
Like I said, he is still a swordsman so he isn't helpless.
You do know BB has to touch him for his fruit to not work right because you are arguing as if the entire fight will be DFless Law vs BB.
Not a single one of them took a direct punch besides BB. WB threw a punch in their general direction. Even Akainu was temporarily immobilized after two hits, and it was the same guy who treated Marco and Vista like bugs.
Akainu was immobilized mainly thanks to island splitting punch. The first one was off guard.
It's not like it takes several minutes. He has to rise his hand in a weird way, that takes less time than Zoro's Onigiri or Luffy's gears. Law's not exactly well known for having super quick reactions. Not when he's gonna be in an uncomfortable position while being pulled in. He's getting punched before he even realizes he couldn't use his powers
It doesn't have to take several minutes. This is why I said you downplay Law because you have been assuming things Law can't do based on nothing. Law's reactions were quick enough to block Kaido who was directly in his face.
Why's it weak? Coz the strongest admiral withstood it?
Because it barely broke ground on an off guard Akainu. The second punch actually split the entire island.
I don't see how that's any different from Sanji's CoA could be superior to Luffy's coz it's a possibility, so he could mitigate damage from GGnM of all things
No because we have already seen the limits of Sanji's COA strength. We have not seen the limits of Law's COA strength...so claiming that Law's COA cannot be stronger than Luffy's is baseless.
Coz we have no reason to believe Law's Haki is superior.
Which still doesn't make it fact unless you have something to prove his haki is weaker. Claiming it is weaker because you haven't seen it stronger is not a valid claim
Except we do. Luffy has a highly advanced Haki and Law's Haki hasn't done anything for us to confirm it could operate at that level when all he ever did was some basic blocking. If Law had the same level of Haki as Luffy then he'd be running around with Zoro putting scares on him without even needing Room.
No we don't. There is a difference between haki strength and haki technique. Luffy has superior techniques (barrier and penetration) but his level of haki strength vis a vis Law's is unknown.
Here is an example, Luffy pre Udon had haki strength superior to Sandersonia but his haki technique was inferior because he lacked barrier.
think everyone already knows how Haki works. Saying "Law's Haki isn't weak" doesn't prove his Haki mitigates GGnM damage to a significant degree. You're supposed to provide evidence to support these claims
You made the claim that his haki couldn't which was baseless so quite strange you ask for proof of the opposite.
Regardless we actually do have a direct comparison supporting the claim that Law can Block a gura punch.
-In MF, a gura punch was matched by Sengoku's Shockwave.
- Sengoku's Shockwave couldn't knock out Burgess (in fact it did minor damage)
-If that did minor damage to Burgess then it would do even less to Law. If Law uses haki then that would be mitigated to negligible damage.
Obviously, that's how logic works. You judge things based on what they did, not based on what you want them to do. If Law's best feat is blocking Doffy's Five-Colored String, then it's perfectly logical to assume he could block comparable attacks. GGnM attacks are on a completely different level.
Only your logic. You are judging a feat from Law several arcs ago which was a successful defense to claim that he CANNOT block something in the current arc. How you made that correlation is not logic
