I wouldn't describe it, it describes no systemic issue. Therefore it doesn't exist. Until you understand that I'm describing the use of the word in front of a systemic issue, you will have a problem understanding toxic masculinty.
Again, you don't understand. Those toxic behavior are not inherantly masculine, they are OBSERVED in MAJORITY in men. That's not a birth things, that's a SOCIAL thing. Men are not born evil, they are raised sexist and therefore mostly depict toxic behavior that female don't or in minority. Hence why we call those behavior "toxic masculinity".
Same as your pal : Until you understand that I'm describing the use of the word in front of a systemic issue, you will have a problem understanding toxic masculinty.
Yes, hence why we call that "toxic masculinity". The social importance of the phenomenon in men is enough to describe it as a gender based. Again, you need to understand that this is a sociological description not a term that describe a behavior inherant to a gender.
Now, Read carefully what I will be writing here because this is important.
The social description of a behavior is important to understand a phenomenone.
Why ? Because by not linking the word to masculinity, you CAN'T understand the link between those toxic behavior and the fallacious vision of masculinity that creates those behavior in majority in men. Do you understand ?
There is a link between the vision created by an poor education on masculinity and the toxic behavior seen in majority in male. That's a sociological fact. Hence why we need to call that "toxic masculinity".
In short the term "Toxic masculinity" permits us to separate what is toxic in masculinities (for example, raising a boy by telling him that men don't cry) from what is non-toxic in the masculinities (for example, raising a kid in the vision that men and women are equals). Therefore permitting us to creates globally more positive behaviors in men and decreasing the number of toxic abuse between men and women but ALSO between men themself.
I can't be clearer than that.
There is a point. Sociologically, it's important to name a problem to understand the issue and find solutions.
You can also explain gender through the scope of gender studies, but that not a field of mine so it would be difficult for me to really make you guys understand some principles. There are plenty of feminism specialized in those sociological domain, I suggest you go follow them. Tho I can't really give you names, as I mainly follow french feminists.
I'll soon post a thread about feminism so be ready lol
Again, you don't understand. Those toxic behavior are not inherantly masculine, they are OBSERVED in MAJORITY in men. That's not a birth things, that's a SOCIAL thing. Men are not born evil, they are raised sexist and therefore mostly depict toxic behavior that female don't or in minority. Hence why we call those behavior "toxic masculinity".
Same as your pal : Until you understand that I'm describing the use of the word in front of a systemic issue, you will have a problem understanding toxic masculinty.
Yes, hence why we call that "toxic masculinity". The social importance of the phenomenon in men is enough to describe it as a gender based. Again, you need to understand that this is a sociological description not a term that describe a behavior inherant to a gender.
Now, Read carefully what I will be writing here because this is important.
The social description of a behavior is important to understand a phenomenone.
Why ? Because by not linking the word to masculinity, you CAN'T understand the link between those toxic behavior and the fallacious vision of masculinity that creates those behavior in majority in men. Do you understand ?
There is a link between the vision created by an poor education on masculinity and the toxic behavior seen in majority in male. That's a sociological fact. Hence why we need to call that "toxic masculinity".
In short the term "Toxic masculinity" permits us to separate what is toxic in masculinities (for example, raising a boy by telling him that men don't cry) from what is non-toxic in the masculinities (for example, raising a kid in the vision that men and women are equals). Therefore permitting us to creates globally more positive behaviors in men and decreasing the number of toxic abuse between men and women but ALSO between men themself.
I can't be clearer than that.
Post automatically merged:
There is a point. Sociologically, it's important to name a problem to understand the issue and find solutions.
You can also explain gender through the scope of gender studies, but that not a field of mine so it would be difficult for me to really make you guys understand some principles. There are plenty of feminism specialized in those sociological domain, I suggest you go follow them. Tho I can't really give you names, as I mainly follow french feminists.
Post automatically merged:
I'll soon post a thread about feminism so be ready lol
There are enough evidences who was abuser i believe the court not your opinion.
Nice bait eitherway looks like pseudo feminist like yourself clearly is more harmful to woman .