World War 3

Awareness =/= hyping up.

Adam falls from the wrong tree. I don't know where this dude gets this bullshit.

This is exactly what Russia wants, they want you to believe they are a fragile colossus on clay feet.

They've been gathering $ for years and putting in into Military.

If NATO was so almighty, powerful and relevant Russia would never do that.

@Master OF Haki Adam is from Croatia if I recall. Ofc they will say bs cause they are not in the harm's way.
Adam might also be from Baltic countries, the smaller the dog the louder it barks. In Europe it's usually the midgets who bark all the time.
 
Doubt China will join Russia.
I think it's more likely that China and Russia are on the same side along with possibly India being the main forces on that side.
Thankfully the missile that hit Poland didn't come from Russia, however I am wondering, shouldn't Poland, as a frontier against Russia at least, have good anti-missile systems ? I get that EU countries left their armies to rot because of how peaceful europe was becoming, but it doesn't make sense for NATO(America's alliance) to do so, especially in case of actual Russian attack.

Maybe the USA just has plans to arm Poland like it armed Ukraine in case of an attack, which makes more sense as that would leave Poland relying on America in its worst case scenario.
That's one if the main issues that gets on my nerves about the UN, the US is the only nation in the UN with a military that can hold it's own and other nations come to us first expecting us to send our people and resources when they're incapable of protecting themselves. Yet even knowing this they make little to no effort to improve their own fighting forces. Regardless of what conflicts arise across the world, if Russia or China is involved the US is the only nation capable of getting involved to maintain balance. Don't get me wrong there are always Americans willing to put their lives on the line to help those in need but it's ridiculous for the rest of the UN to automatically assume that it is our job or responsibility. We're like the big brother that is always having to save the little brothers from fights because they never took the time to learn how to fight on their own, eventually everyone needs to learn how to take care of themselves because it's a fact of human nature that the peaceful societies most of us live in are anomalies when it comes to human nature. There is always going to be someone willing to kill you to take what they want and if you're not prepared to take care of yourself you only have 2 options, beg for help/mercy or die.
 
I think it's more likely that China and Russia are on the same side along with possibly India being the main forces on that side.

That's one if the main issues that gets on my nerves about the UN, the US is the only nation in the UN with a military that can hold it's own and other nations come to us first expecting us to send our people and resources when they're incapable of protecting themselves. Yet even knowing this they make little to no effort to improve their own fighting forces. Regardless of what conflicts arise across the world, if Russia or China is involved the US is the only nation capable of getting involved to maintain balance. Don't get me wrong there are always Americans willing to put their lives on the line to help those in need but it's ridiculous for the rest of the UN to automatically assume that it is our job or responsibility. We're like the big brother that is always having to save the little brothers from fights because they never took the time to learn how to fight on their own, eventually everyone needs to learn how to take care of themselves because it's a fact of human nature that the peaceful societies most of us live in are anomalies when it comes to human nature. There is always going to be someone willing to kill you to take what they want and if you're not prepared to take care of yourself you only have 2 options, beg for help/mercy or die.
The US are literally starting those conflicts and the countries they send aid to are their proxies. If they use the countries the least they can do is help.
 
Right because the US is to blame for Russia invading Ukraine...
No, but they are to blame for many other wars. If you drive people into wars, you have to at least help them. It's actually mind boggling how many Americans think Europeans or countries from Asia start wars and they just help them when the US are the ones driving a lot of them.
 
No, but they are to blame for many other wars. If you drive people into wars, you have to at least help them. It's actually mind boggling how many Americans think Europeans or countries from Asia start wars and they just help them when the US are the ones driving a lot of them.
but like name them tho
 

TheAncientCenturion

I will never forgive Oda
‎‎‎
No, but they are to blame for many other wars. If you drive people into wars, you have to at least help them. It's actually mind boggling how many Americans think Europeans or countries from Asia start wars and they just help them when the US are the ones driving a lot of them.
:risicheck: The U.S. literally got involved in Vietnam to help the French out with their Vietnamese war... Korea was due to Truman wanting to contain communism and support the Democratic South Korea.

The bombing of Indochina was pretty bad and Iraq in 2003 wasn't good, either. Won't defend those.
 
Top