Character Discussion Admirals are more interesting than Yonkous??

#84
Depending on how the Oda reveals them. Because we know practically nothing about them as characters. Hope dies last. Yonko, in principle, were potentially interesting, just like admirals now, but the author screwed up with this. Shanks and Teach still look more interesting than admirals.:pepelit:
 
#87
Admirals mostly aren't complex characters. They are soldiers without an own set of morals or inner thought, they just obey orders of the higher ups. With the Yonko, they have a more complex thought process and ambitions, shaped by their individual experiences and world view.

Now with Aokiji, he also has gotten bigger ambitions, but the result is him becoming a pirate.
 
#89
For me, Kizaru was always more interesting than Kaido or Big Mom because of his behavior and the fact that his justice is called unclear
Please, Oda, don't lose the Kizaru:pepecopium:
 

Apollo

The Sol King
#98
The cow that milked two yonko commanders dry at the same time, with zero injuries? :suresure:

"My defense is stronger than Crydo..."
*gets drained by wood tentacle
:josad:
"I can see the future, my back never touched the ground..."
*gets blinded by some gas
:josad:
Even our yonko is calling himself an Admiral....

How will we cope with this ? :pepecopium:
 
Well, in general, Revolutionaries, and especially the Dragon, are more interesting than Yonkov in terms of potential disclosure. Like Vegapunk after the first mention. So it turns out like this in descending order of interest: Revolutionaries > Vegapunk > Admirals > Yonko. But this only concerns me. And it would be good if Oda didn't pull with them:pepeke:
 
Top