Oh I'm not passive aggressive. I'm fully aggressive. I just don't use Curse words. But if you can understand what I'm saying you can bey clearly tell I'm very aggressive.
And if you want me to say something different, then actually address a point I made. Because if you just repeat a thing I will also respond with a repeated statement
What point? There is nothing thematic about Zoro beating king. Zoro doesn't need to be the best swordsman in wano. he just needs to be the best swordsman EoS and there is still many arcs left before EoS.
I fail to see the connection between wano being an arc of swordsmen and zoro leaving wano as the strongest swordsman. I don't think Sanji's cooking in WCI can be compared to Zoro's swordsmanship.
Sanji's cooking was largely seen as a useless skill and WCI was an arc where Oda went out of his way to show how important it was by having Sanji essentially save an entire nation with his cooking abilities. Sanji's kindness was a theme throughout the arc. He is such a good person that he will go out of his way even to save his enemies.
What theme would be fulfilled by having Zoro beat King? that Zoro is strong? Wano being an arc of samurai doesn't mean that Zoro needs to beat the strongest swordsman in wano, no more than Sanji needing to have a fight in WCI because "year of sanji" or something.
Perhaps the character development zoro will get in wano will be that he, who was more or less able to walk through the new world ease free, will get utterly destroyed by Kaido. He will try to cut Kaido in his strongest form and fail miserably. Kaido would beat the utter shit out of him and break his sword.
this would then be a springboard for him becoming even stronger in the future arcs.