Mihawk is a pure or ''real'' swordsman, someone who concentrates only on fighting with a sword. Shanks is a swordsman and a haki master. Remove Mihawk's sword and you get someone who even Holdem can beat.
Mihawk is a pure or ''real'' swordsman, someone who concentrates only on fighting with a sword. Shanks is a swordsman and a haki master. Remove Mihawk's sword and you get someone who even Holdem can beat.
He doesnt hint shit
In sbs hes started drawing human forms of swordsmens swords.
He did zoros first and has futher done yoru and brook.
But you know the second one he did was.
Yeah swordsman shanks gryphon
kejon has got to be baiting
even old man hyo could , a swordmaster could hold his own without a sword.
haki mastery is part of swordmanship
haki mastery was why roger's attack with his blade overpowered oden.
what a can of bs.
if you thinks shanks wins that fine.
dont raise bs that you havent seen tho .
you havent really seen either go attack or defend without a sword.
and haki control whether you have a sword or not is still pretty strong as seen with rayleigh, hyogoro etc.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
He can protect himself. Mihawk can only fight with a sword 
