Nearest planet in habitate zone is Proxima B. It will take 70000+ years for voyager to reach this planet.
I read a possible theory how that could be achieved under premise we advance space travel to something like 100-200 years

In that scenario humanity would make spacecraft where generation would/die be born until they reach desired planets
 
Some antiracist activists argue that idiolizing a people is racist because it’s not better than hating them since it’s basically untrue. It’s a bit silly imo.
Being racist = adopting and acknowledging cultures

One of those bunch that consider wearing attire of other traditions that you are not native too is racist.


Counter intuitive AS HELL
Post automatically merged:

As of now no humans will make it....

Nearest planet in habitate zone is Proxima B. It will take 70000+ years for voyager to reach this planet.

Our recorded history is just 10% of this time...
Earth is really rare tbh

-We have 2 gas giants deflecting asteroids from hitting us

- we're in the Goldilocks Zone sweet spot


- Have our own Moon


- We have Iron that wasn't initially present with Earth but actually was a result of constant meteorites bombardment


Among all those qualities we're the only intelligent beings on the planet.
 
Last edited:
I read a possible theory how that could be achieved under premise we advance space travel to something like 100-200 years

In that scenario humanity would make spacecraft where generation would/die be born until they reach desired planets
It is not conclusive, also "X will be available in Y years" is not at all the same as "X will not be available for at least Y years"

It's also not just energy alone, our body can only withstand a sustained acceleration up to 5G. With that limit, achieving a fraction of the speed of light would take days, and the distance it takes would be much more than billions of meter.

I think it would take much more than a hundred year, possibly even thousands of years to achieve a safe interstellar travel. A former NASA propulsionist once said it will not be possible until at least 2200. I doubt humanity will survive until that point.

At best, i think we can only roam freely inside our solar system before extinction hit us
 
Actually these nutcases are trying to make it possible with men to by altering their anatomy
That's why I say science is not the universal truth. It can investigate, research, and try to find "how things work," but it can never create new universal laws.
Like,
  • The sun rises in the East and falls in the West.
  • The earth revolves around the sun.
  • Humans are mortals.
  • Changing is nature's law.
  • Water is tasteless, colorless, and odorless.
  • Sun gives us light
  • Females give birth/ in other species; they lay eggs, etc.
Now, science can define the process of how these things happen. But can never change how they operate.

It is simple 1+1 = 2 for the sane. But a complex question for insane ones (leftists). They don't need help from psychologists at this point; they need good old beating.
 
I took a peek, they meant female who identify as man. I dont know tho why they need a whole article just for that lmao
They need acknowledgment, legitimacy, and social acceptance so that they can move to their next agenda; legalizing child p##n, satanic practices, social disorder, and confusing people so that normal citizens stay busy on these issues and individuals in power rule the world and control wealth however they want.
Post automatically merged:

What?
 
That's why I say science is not the universal truth. It can investigate, research, and try to find "how things work," but it can never create new universal laws.
Like,
  • The sun rises in the East and falls in the West.
  • The earth revolves around the sun.
  • Humans are mortals.
  • Changing is nature's law.
  • Water is tasteless, colorless, and odorless.
  • Sun gives us light
  • Females give birth/ in other species; they lay eggs, etc.
Now, science can define the process of how these things happen. But can never change how they operate.

It is simple 1+1 = 2 for the sane. But a complex question for insane ones (leftists). They don't need help from psychologists at this point; they need good old beating.
true! Good ol beating 😭
Science is just empirical studies observations it can always change based in new observations

It a practical lense we look at nature or thw universe from.. So if they use it to twist universal realities it ain't ending well for em
 
That's why I say science is not the universal truth. It can investigate, research, and try to find "how things work," but it can never create new universal laws.
Like,
  • The sun rises in the East and falls in the West.
  • The earth revolves around the sun.
  • Humans are mortals.
  • Changing is nature's law.
  • Water is tasteless, colorless, and odorless.
  • Sun gives us light
  • Females give birth/ in other species; they lay eggs, etc.
Now, science can define the process of how these things happen. But can never change how they operate.

It is simple 1+1 = 2 for the sane. But a complex question for insane ones (leftists). They don't need help from psychologists at this point; they need good old beating.
Even though it's a good thing that leftists like an empirical based approach, it's still a major flaw that they often disregards their moral.

They might eventually end up accepting bestiality, nudity in public, incest, etc. All these just because they have the 'consent'. Society with no morals standard will definitely collapse because they have nothing to fight for
 
That's why I say science is not the universal truth. It can investigate, research, and try to find "how things work," but it can never create new universal laws.
Like,
  • The sun rises in the East and falls in the West.
  • The earth revolves around the sun.
  • Humans are mortals.
  • Changing is nature's law.
  • Water is tasteless, colorless, and odorless.
  • Sun gives us light
  • Females give birth/ in other species; they lay eggs, etc.
Now, science can define the process of how these things happen. But can never change how they operate.

It is simple 1+1 = 2 for the sane. But a complex question for insane ones (leftists). They don't need help from psychologists at this point; they need good old beating.
The scientific method is fantastic,but scientists are humans too.Not long ago scientists were justifying apartheid and eugenics.
 
Last edited:
Even though it's a good thing that leftists like an empirical based approach, it's still a major flaw that they often disregards their moral.

They might eventually end up accepting bestiality, nudity in public, incest, etc. All these just because they have the 'consent'. Society with no morals standard will definitely collapse because they have nothing to fight for
Science can never be greater than societal values.
They need a cover for their malpractices. Like, if gender fluidity and trans are new things. And researchers are just finding evidence now. Then why not use different pronouns and leave male/female out of it?
They can call them Femboy, Bomen, or whatever. Will it not solve all of the issues?
But they don't want this. They want acknowledgment. They want chaos. They have hidden agendas, and it does not make sense on the surface level. But it is becoming clear the way they are pushing it on children.
 
Top