- Status
The quote I pulled was from 20~ minutes after Neutralwatcher's. I find that unlikely. You even quote him before you lay out your strat. to lynch me for info.
So your insistence to push me after that info came to light and after you mentioned it is very sus to me. You were too eager and too on the ball for the normal Cinera. Too open to Flower's words being correct despite the controversy surrounding them.
I don't see your point here. You say if Flower flips scum, it wouldn't verify me. But isn't that also the same thing if I flip scum? In the wiki, one of the prime strats. for Cult was to intentionally kill off your allies if you reach max occupancy to convert others. We have no idea how many enemies the scum start with. Could be 1, could be more. You have zero reason to believe me flipping scum would verify Flowers. Especially with the added heat on her.
For the redirection, that would be some kind of luck.
Quite late.
You just claimed that you know Unseen is not in the game though?
Why would we need DA's flip to tell his alignment if you're an Invest role and already know what the Scum faction is?
Why would we need DA's flip to tell his alignment if you're an Invest role and already know what the Scum faction is?
So your insistence to push me after that info came to light and after you mentioned it is very sus to me. You were too eager and too on the ball for the normal Cinera. Too open to Flower's words being correct despite the controversy surrounding them.
I don't see your point here. You say if Flower flips scum, it wouldn't verify me. But isn't that also the same thing if I flip scum? In the wiki, one of the prime strats. for Cult was to intentionally kill off your allies if you reach max occupancy to convert others. We have no idea how many enemies the scum start with. Could be 1, could be more. You have zero reason to believe me flipping scum would verify Flowers. Especially with the added heat on her.
For the redirection, that would be some kind of luck.
Quite late.
At this rate, Flower and TAC alone have brought up so many roles that it is a bit alarming.
I'm not comfortable with so many claims happening. It's hard to prioritize who to protect etc.
Could also be scum trying to lure out the different roles and get a map of which players is what. But if that's the case, it is a high risk game to be playing.
I'm not comfortable with so many claims happening. It's hard to prioritize who to protect etc.
Could also be scum trying to lure out the different roles and get a map of which players is what. But if that's the case, it is a high risk game to be playing.
N
Is there a penalty for lynching jester? From the wiki there is a penalty for lynching Fool
From wikipedia:
If the Fool is executed, then all those who voted to execute them will lose 1charge from all limited-use abilities. In addition, there can be no trials the next day. If executed before Day 3, there can be no trials for 2 days.
From wikipedia:
If the Fool is executed, then all those who voted to execute them will lose 1charge from all limited-use abilities. In addition, there can be no trials the next day. If executed before Day 3, there can be no trials for 2 days.
A quick google says, the prince
https://tol.fandom.com/wiki/The_Prince
https://tol.fandom.com/wiki/The_Prince
yeah, if she is the fool (the jester I was referring to), then it is likely that she just picked a random player to do this on and make a bold claim hoping that she will get caught.
But like, if I was her and that was the strategy I was going for, I don't know if I would of picked TAC. So yes, you do have a good point and another reason why I am still not convinced that Flower is the fool.
Jester is the Fool. So yes, we will be penalized for lynching the Fool
But like, if I was her and that was the strategy I was going for, I don't know if I would of picked TAC. So yes, you do have a good point and another reason why I am still not convinced that Flower is the fool.
Jester is the Fool. So yes, we will be penalized for lynching the Fool
Nope. That post isn't explaining a strategy to Lynch you for info. That post was challenging @Natalija's hypothesis that Flower claimed Unseen to confuse Town. This is the post I was responding to:
This is blatant dishonesty TAC.
This is blatant dishonesty TAC.
I misread it then, because I saw the same detailed reasoning for lynching me and jumped to conclusions. It doesn't make me less suspicious of you or your behavior though.
E
so flower vs nat can't be a town vs town scenario unless a person who can swap or control targets did this if there is a townie who messed up the investigations they probably should claim to avoid a mislynch
nat investigated flower and said she was social/support (townie), I don't know much about ToL roles but I assume framers would make they target seem as bad guys to investigative roles instead of a social/support, so flower couldn't possibly be framed
cinera vehemently supporting flower and defending himself is definitely weird behaviour
if NW is the paladin (sheriff/paladin is a guaranteed and unique role, so false claiming this role is basically suicide) then flower is 100% not a blue dragon, because paladin and unseen faction can't be in the same game, but in that case, why would nat claim flower is social/support? there is definitely roles similar to bus driver/witch in this game
the way I see it, nat has no reason to lie
tac can't be lying that he was jailed, because he could be easily counterclaimed and the prince would probably execute him tonight
tbh flower seems too suspicious for a experienced player like her, I would prefer to let the prince (jailor) deal with her instead of lynching flower, because I know there is a jester role in this game (the fool)
nat investigated flower and said she was social/support (townie), I don't know much about ToL roles but I assume framers would make they target seem as bad guys to investigative roles instead of a social/support, so flower couldn't possibly be framed
cinera vehemently supporting flower and defending himself is definitely weird behaviour
if NW is the paladin (sheriff/paladin is a guaranteed and unique role, so false claiming this role is basically suicide) then flower is 100% not a blue dragon, because paladin and unseen faction can't be in the same game, but in that case, why would nat claim flower is social/support? there is definitely roles similar to bus driver/witch in this game
the way I see it, nat has no reason to lie
tac can't be lying that he was jailed, because he could be easily counterclaimed and the prince would probably execute him tonight
tbh flower seems too suspicious for a experienced player like her, I would prefer to let the prince (jailor) deal with her instead of lynching flower, because I know there is a jester role in this game (the fool)
- Status