Spoiler One Piece Chapter 1077 Spoilers Discussion

Who is the traitor?


  • Total voters
    268
Status
Not open for further replies.
Apparently according to you guys it makes any sense to turn off the flame ability that nullifies any attack JUST before the attack and then turn it back on when the damage is done. Yep..GigaIQ on display here.
:suresure:

Here's the flame on before Nami lands the attack.


Here's the flame on 1 sec after the attack. I'm not interested in fanfics.
They scared that after lunarian defense is being revealed weak to lasers and elemental damage they can’t say “Queen can’t even damage king” anymore.
 
Apparently according to you guys it makes any sense to turn off the flame ability that nullifies any attack JUST before the attack and then turn it back on when the damage is done. Yep..GigaIQ on display here.
Don't parrot your own claims as someone else's


Here's the flame on before Nami lands the attack.
Nobody denied this


Here's the flame on 1 sec after the attack. I'm not interested in fanfics
Nobody denied this either

There's one panel left intellectually dishonest fellow
 
They scared that after lunarian defense is being revealed weak to lasers and elemental damage they can’t say “Queen can’t even damage king” anymore.
They literally accuse others of being blind but then literally lie that before and after the attack the flames on S-Shark's back aren't on when they CLEARLY are visible on panel. Ridiculous.
 
Nah man
Look to the left of the namis ass panel. The flame is off
It's just not drawn because you see S-Shark from the front and the panel itself is pretty narrow. We see his flames on while Nami is charging her attack, and we see the Flames on when the attack is finished. Why would the flame just go off during that instance without Shark doing anything. Or if it really turned off that instance, it's a weakness of the Lunarian flame.
 
They literally accuse others of being blind but then literally lie that before and after the attack the flames on S-Shark's back aren't on when they CLEARLY are visible on panel. Ridiculous.
You are losing touch with reality.
The argument is about when the lightning hit S-Shark not what happened before or after.
It is ironic because you just proved that you are blind
 
It's just not drawn because you see S-Shark from the front and the panel itself is pretty narrow. We see his flames on while Nami is charging her attack, and we see the Flames on when the attack is finished. Why would the flame just go off during that instance without Shark doing anything. Or if it really turned off that instance, it's a weakness of the Lunarian flame.
We also see S-shark without flames when holding Nami but then has flames in the next panel when Sanji hits it
 
They literally accuse others of being blind but then literally lie that before and after the attack the flames on S-Shark's back aren't on when they CLEARLY are visible on panel. Ridiculous.
This panel doesn’t make sense otherwise

Oda could have draw the exact same panel but with no flame if his intent was to show S-Shark was only hurt due to his defense being off
 
You are losing touch with reality.
The argument is about when the lightning hit S-Shark not what happened before or after.
It is ironic because you just proved that you are blind
Actually its you who lose touch with reality. He is right about flames on and still taking damage. Anyone who denies that is delusional period.
 
Don't parrot your own claims as someone else's
Coming from the guy that says "Oda didn't give an explanation so we prove that S-Shark didn't conveniently turn off his flame for some reason"
There's one panel left intellectually dishonest fellow
The only dishonest one here is the guy pretending that there's a magical reason that between those 2 panels S-Shark turned the flame off for whatever reason even when it defeats the purpose of the ability itself.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top