Controversial General Political Discussion

[Tensub]

Jesus was a character in the bible
not a real person or thing

Difference being with hitler
we have photos and videos of him ie objective evidence which didt exist the supposed time jesus was around

Those photos and videos of him likely won't exist 1000 years later

 

[NikaInParis]

When did i call you a clown?When did i attack you?

He isn't talking about you but Tonnes

 

[Bisoromi Bear]

kids do all kinds of stupid stuff,talking it out doesn't always work either.Some kids challenge their parents.Some need an asswhopping within reasonable limits.

Violence doesn't solve the root cause of the problem.
It only creates people like you

 

[Gol D. Roger]

Using your logic, it's okay for homophobic people to disrespect gay people?

Bunch of hypocrites. Left and right are the same, just under different ideologies.

Lol, all of them want to insult the other group, but they don't want to get insulted in return.

 

[NAMELESS]

Homosexuality being a mental disorder or not is a scientific debate.When i called this out i knew it was a controversial topic and people would get offended,but i didn't go out of my way to call anyone names without being called names first.i'm pretty sure the forums rules are to not call people names.The stuff about Jesus is a point black insult.

Post automatically merged: Mar 9, 2023

He isn't talking about you but Tonnes

ohh my bad

 

[NikaInParis]

Jesus was a character in the bible
not a real person or thing

Difference being with hitler
we have photos and videos of him ie objective evidence which didt exist the supposed time jesus was around

Then nobody before the advent of photography existed lmaooo

 

[NAMELESS]

Those photos and videos of him likely won't exist 1000 years later

you bet they will,the internet won't go anywhere and the jews won't forget.

 

[Bisoromi Bear]

Jesus was a character in the bible
not a real person or thing

He was holy crap

 

[Bob74h]

Those photos and videos of him likely won't exist 1000 years later

There are records
people keep of these things

I doubt it

but in the circumstance
where there is no evidence of hitler existing

I would say he dont exist
but as it stands right now we have evidence that he existed

 

[Seatonnes]

sent the message to Pan, TAC and Bogard

 

[Uncle Van]

OK with the whole @NAMELESS vs @Seatonnes "who said it worst!" debate, it's all about intent.

Nameless said homosexuality is a disorder, and he says it due to supposedly scientific studies that he linked. Of course thats a very known and very controversial opinion. Obviously people will call that homophobic and act like he trying to eliminate them or something. Where can you say that his intent was to antagonize or take away the rights of homosexuals or something?

Seatonnes on the other hand, knows that Jesus has no confirmed gender but still flat out called him gay with the intent to antagonize Nameless. He said something controversial solely to annoy a certain user.

 

[NAMELESS]

Bro, I didn't even talk with you in this thread. I am not talking about you.



Then he should've approached the team instead of bitching about it after everything's said and done.

my bad,i got quoted so many times i thought it was about me.

 

[Tejas]

See the hypocrisy:
Yesterday people wer being disrespectful to Hindus and Hindu Gods.
The same people now saying that Jesus must be represented correctly to not disrespect Christians.
@Gol D. Roger

 

[Seatonnes]

OK with the whole @NAMELESS vs @Seatonnes "who said it worst!" debate, it's all about intent.

Nameless said homosexuality is a disorder, and he says it due to supposedly scientific studies that he linked. Of course thats a very known and very controversial opinion. Obviously people will call that homophobic and act like he trying to eliminate them or something. Where can you say that his intent was to antagonize or take away the rights of homosexuals or something?

Seatonnes on the other hand, knows that Jesus has no confirmed gender but still flat out called him gay with the intent to antagonize Nameless. He said something controversial solely to annoy a certain user.

dont worry already sent a message to the admins

 

[NAMELESS]

OK with the whole @NAMELESS vs @Seatonnes "who said it worst!" debate, it's all about intent.

Nameless said homosexuality is a disorder, and he says it due to supposedly scientific studies that he linked. Of course thats a very known and very controversial opinion. Obviously people will call that homophobic and act like he trying to eliminate them or something. Where can you say that his intent was to antagonize or take away the rights of homosexuals or something?

Seatonnes on the other hand, knows that Jesus has no confirmed gender but still flat out called him gay with the intent to antagonize Nameless. He said something controversial solely to annoy a certain user.

some common sense.thnx

 

[Gol D. Roger]

Homosexuality being a mental disorder or not is a scientific debate.When i called this out i knew it was a controversial topic and people would get offended,but i didn't go out of my way to call anyone names without being called names first.i'm pretty sure the forums rules are to not call people names.The stuff about Jesus is a point black insult.

Post automatically merged: Mar 9, 2023

ohh my bad

I don't mind you having and expressing your views, but calling it an illness does make it offensive. Well, at least, that's how it is for a vast majority of them. So I'd ask you to avoid doing it from now on.

 

[Bob74h]

Then nobody before the advent of photography existed lmaooo

They did
we just cant prove it

 

[NikaInParis]

They did
we just cant prove it

That means they didn't, because there's no proof of it

 

[Haoshoku]

To not punish him is a key indicator that you're, with all due respect, failing as a moderator.

This is a slippery slope tbh, like I said to Nameless earlier people might not intend to insult anyone here but simply expressing a certain view is going to be seen as disrespectful or offensive. In the case of what he said, considering the fact that it was categorized as such in the DSM back in the 70s, there is a little room to give him a pass for that one if he worded it more academically. The best Gol D. Roger can do for you is edit it and word it differently since saying someone has a mental disorder is routinely used as an insult so there’s that.

 

[Tensub]

Homosexuality being a mental disorder or not is a scientific debate.When i called this out i knew it was a controversial topic and people would get offended,but i didn't go out of my way to call anyone names without being called names first.i'm pretty sure the forums rules are to not call people names.The stuff about Jesus is a point black insult.

Post automatically merged: Mar 9, 2023

ohh my bad

Mental disorder is generally used as an insult. Homosexuality is a physiological thing so you're scientifically wrong in that regard.
Gender dysphoria however is a mental thing, which is different from homosexuality.