OK with the whole
@NAMELESS vs
@Seatonnes "who said it worst!" debate, it's all about intent.
Nameless said homosexuality is a disorder, and he says it due to supposedly scientific studies that he linked. Of course thats a very known and very controversial opinion. Obviously people will call that homophobic and act like he trying to eliminate them or something. Where can you say that his intent was to antagonize or take away the rights of homosexuals or something?
Seatonnes on the other hand, knows that Jesus has no confirmed gender but still flat out called him gay with the intent to antagonize Nameless. He said something controversial solely to annoy a certain user.