Why did York Betray Vegapunk?


  • Total voters
    274
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
They panel is right there, king was not drained at all.
And why would he comment on it if he had already restrained and captured him.

Read the story, aramaki has fire proof forest ability.
Also ace melting aokiji's ice did jack shit, just because u can counter it doesn't mean anything. Ice not being immune to fire is a given, the point is did the fire do any damage which it did not.

Stop comparing Aramaki and Katakuri. Its disrespectful to Aramaki as an admiral to be compared to that bozo
Then why did not Aramaki comment on King endurance to resist his plant from drainig him?
Aramaki stabbed King. He drained Kong off panel.

Aramaki did not use his fireproof plant immediately. Seen when he was fighting Momonosuke.

So he firstly he used his normal plant against King and King cannot burn it since there is no panel of burnt plant in the panel of Aramakk beating King and queen.

High tier Ace melted Kuzan ice debunks your argument being top tier Aramaki df is resistant to fire. King fire is just that weak.

King is the bozo. Top tier Rayleigh wanked FS users which means he admitted his prime self cannot low diff fS users including Katakuri since he was talking about FS users to Luffy when he encountered them in his prime.

You still have not addressed that Kata mochi is shown to resist fire. You have no counter argument for this?
 
They panel is right there, king was not drained at all.
And why would he comment on it if he had already restrained and captured him.

Read the story, aramaki has fire proof forest ability.
Also ace melting aokiji's ice did jack shit, just because u can counter it doesn't mean anything. Ice not being immune to fire is a given, the point is did the fire do any damage which it did not.

Stop comparing Aramaki and Katakuri. Its disrespectful to Aramaki as an admiral to be compared to that bozo
GB being admiral doesn't stop his fruit from being immune to fire
King fire isn't lethal and powerful as you guys claim, that's why he lost badly to mere plants from GB

BTW Fire isn't Mochi weakness
I don't even know why you think King burning Mochi will change a thing here.
Burning Mochi actually makes it worse for King
 
GB being admiral doesn't stop his fruit from being immune to fire
King fire isn't lethal and powerful as you guys claim, that's why he lost badly to mere plants from GB

BTW Fire isn't Mochi weakness
I don't even know why you think King burning Mochi will change a thing here.
Burning Mochi actually makes it worse for King
King was heavily nerfed and in Seastone chains
 
You still have not addressed that Kata mochi is shown to resist fire. You have no counter argument for this?
Kata having fire attacks makes him resistant to fire now?
Should i remind you that Luffy was still taking damage from blast breath even though he has fire attacks like red hawk, red roc, etc

BTW Fire isn't Mochi weakness
I don't even know why you think King burning Mochi will change a thing here.
Burning Mochi actually makes it worse for King
Never said fire is mochi weakness. Im saying its a counter to mochi. Fire can counter the stickiness from mochi.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top