It's not about "victimisation". I went over this with you *last time*. You are, consistently, an albatross, and I don't think you engage very honestly. At the very least, you come at this with a loaded angle, and then work from there.
The point, as it's lost on you, is that it's impossible to work with. I am, for some reason, consistently able to draw out behaviour from you and come to the correct read, and you, consistently, cannot do so. Case in point - this game. I gave you my reasoning behind my argument, you haven't analysed it. You haven't even begun to think if it makes sense, and you've ignored the parts of my post that are inconvenient.
-No
-Mostly no, but I'll note that your "town read" was quickly discarded the moment it became convenient for you to do so.
-I don't think your approach was reasonable, no. Mostly deflection, your play improved after that actually.
I've never once claimed that you *were* peas in a pod. I have claimed that he attempted to side to you, he very clearly did actually. Dismissed.