I feel like I'm getting completely ignored so I'll just restate what I said and leave it for today.
TAC, earlier in the game, used someone surviving a kill as a point of suspicion. He did not, however, have any issue with my claim. This was already weird - he survived a superkill today and apparently the only cost was a passive ability. This presents a contradictory line of reasoning from TAC, and one he has no interest in explaining away.
He should be the vote today, and we know superkills fail on him (because of course they do, kills only work on town).