Questions & Mysteries Is advanced CoC really only no touching?
- Thread starter BornInAbyss
- Start date
lol all i know is you said this: You're not a real Swordsman if you're not cutting.. You kind of answered it yourself.. Not touching is not cutting and that is utterly pointless as a Swordsman..
shanks is a prime example of the pinnacle of swordsmanship. how can u argue against the manga when it clearly says there are swordsmen who can not cut but can cut through steel and we see shanks do just that lol
shanks is a prime example of the pinnacle of swordsmanship. how can u argue against the manga when it clearly says there are swordsmen who can not cut but can cut through steel and we see shanks do just that lol
It could be two things imo.
Either
1.Oden and Law do not have barrier haki, thus when they are witnessing such powerful attacks done from a distance they are in awe.
Even if Oden and Law have seen barrier haki, the application of CoC takes it to a whole other level as an offensive tool, so they can simply be shocked how an attack done without contact can be as effective as they are witnessing (this might be a bit of a reach though).
Tldr;
Their reactions are to highlight overall haki mastery/proficiency (application of high level CoA and high level CoC) vs simply advCoC or simply barrier haki.
Which does make (some) sense.
OR
2. AdvCoC is just a copy of CoA where it has levels/versions to it and non contact is the lvl 2 version of CoC regardless of any CoA application.
My issue with number 2 is the emphasis Luffy puts on learning non contact from hyou in prison. Which is a CoA application.
The counter argument would be learning how CoA flow works helped Luffy apply the same logic to CoC, but that requires more assumptions (and it strips CoA of it's use completely, or uniqueness) so I don't subscribe to it.
Anyways thanks Oda 👍
Either
1.Oden and Law do not have barrier haki, thus when they are witnessing such powerful attacks done from a distance they are in awe.
Even if Oden and Law have seen barrier haki, the application of CoC takes it to a whole other level as an offensive tool, so they can simply be shocked how an attack done without contact can be as effective as they are witnessing (this might be a bit of a reach though).
Tldr;
Their reactions are to highlight overall haki mastery/proficiency (application of high level CoA and high level CoC) vs simply advCoC or simply barrier haki.
Which does make (some) sense.
OR
2. AdvCoC is just a copy of CoA where it has levels/versions to it and non contact is the lvl 2 version of CoC regardless of any CoA application.
My issue with number 2 is the emphasis Luffy puts on learning non contact from hyou in prison. Which is a CoA application.
The counter argument would be learning how CoA flow works helped Luffy apply the same logic to CoC, but that requires more assumptions (and it strips CoA of it's use completely, or uniqueness) so I don't subscribe to it.
Anyways thanks Oda 👍
The visual difference is Not touching..
Other than that one is a CoA based CoC attack while the other is a CoC based CoA attack..
And i will go as far to say that Black Blades will be a CoA based CoC application..
I'd like you to think of Roger's Kamusari and Dragon Damnation as the Swordsmen version of Kuja Arrows..
Or even Ace's spears..
That was not Internal Destruction, Only AdCoC.. Else it would have looked bigger like Garp's attack..
Other than that one is a CoA based CoC attack while the other is a CoC based CoA attack..
And i will go as far to say that Black Blades will be a CoA based CoC application..
I'd like you to think of Roger's Kamusari and Dragon Damnation as the Swordsmen version of Kuja Arrows..
Or even Ace's spears..
Post automatically merged:
That was not Internal Destruction, Only AdCoC.. Else it would have looked bigger like Garp's attack..
No she hit him with internal destruction as it has the same case as Luffy's CoC. Luffy's internal destruction was too shallow so to amp the power of his internal destruction he added his CoC into it.
Wrong Garp's attack doesn't overwrite what's already been written and explained in Wano. You making up your own headcanon measuring tool
Post automatically merged:
That was not Internal Destruction, Only AdCoC.. Else it would have looked bigger like Garp's attack..
Let me ask, what would happen if Luffy used CoA and made a barrier… And then Added CoC to it and then punched someone with CoA barrier mixed with CoC
what’s the difference between that and AdvCoC?
@Psalm
And if I say “Big mom made a level 2 haki barrier and then added CoC to it and hit page one”
what in the manga proves the above stated is wrong
what’s the difference between that and AdvCoC?
Post automatically merged:
@Psalm
And if I say “Big mom made a level 2 haki barrier and then added CoC to it and hit page one”
what in the manga proves the above stated is wrong
No she hit him with internal destruction as it has the same case as Luffy's CoC. Luffy's internal destruction was too shallow so to amp the power of his internal destruction he added his CoC into it.
Wrong Garp's attack doesn't overwrite what's already been written and explained in Wano. You making up your own headcanon measuring tool
Post automatically merged:
Wrong Garp's attack doesn't overwrite what's already been written and explained in Wano. You making up your own headcanon measuring tool