Cartilage is a soft bone in arabic siyou are coping harder.. You have to be an illiterate Vapid Tiwt to use English definitions ti understandother languages
Cartilage sets a modles for the bones and the muscle fiber ie: early skeletal muscles form around it.
Youn do you mate are just you're trying to propagate your delusion and aren't going to accept anything even if its proven its not special amongst atheist darwanist apologist to gasslight yourself reality to retardation and act like
An incompetent imbecile with ego issues
You keep blaming me for gish galloping yet you can't provide clear answers or even address. Logic
pointing at similarity with the intention to find a common ancestor (which you clearly did and keep running away from and gas lighting yourself like a bitchy clown) is homology and you are just too much of an ape mentally to process that
Whats low is that a twat with such puny reasoning skills has the gal to point fingers and and say "YOU ARE USING ASSUMPTIONS FOR DIFFERN DESCENT TOO".. shows how much of a intellectual weasel you are using
This whole time me and @Photon have been providing evidences that there are assumptions fundamentally involved in Ape-Human ancestry and you cannot which cannot be used to project a certain HYPOTHESIS..
We never made a case of different descent we just proposed POSSIBLILTIES
Coz unlike your illiterate self-delusion monkey ass we realise and scientists reiterate " HYPOTHESIS REMAIN HYPOTHESIS UNTLE PROVEN TRUE FUNDAMENTALLY "
Here is what Johnathan Marks an Evoluthionsry Biologist and An atheist say about BIAS
" In other words, this apparent fact of nature – the overwhelming genetic similarity of human and ape – is a fact constructed from culture. That is not to say it is inaccurate or false; just that its meaning is far less obvious than it may appear superficially.
We make sense of the world, and of our place in it, culturally – and science provides more information for constructing that place. But like any other peoples, our own application of that information to the puzzle of our existence is strongly influenced by our non-scientific ideas, our pervasive folk ideologies of heredity. "
In a page where he debunks the notion of any significant to Human ape similarity and how inflated that DNA similarity notion is
https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/the-cultural-bias-of-genetics-2004-11
So yet again another atheist biologist not a darwanist twit liks you, proving that there are assumptions fundamental and logically involved
Every scientists comparing genome, retrovirus, fossils.. Has an initial hypothesis in mind
"oh look Similarities exist.. It must he due to commin descent"
- then they observe similarities
- and end uo with the same conclusion that similarity is due to commin descebt due to the observed similarities
-A circular reason
- on a probabilistic modle
- with a mechanism as controversial assumptive as Natrual selection
- coming to BIAS CONFIRMING CONCLUSIONS
That is human Aoe ancestry in a Nutshell
But obviously it will go over your head like anything and everything does..
Oh shit.. That is an instuktto anyone who does have a working head.
Cartilage sets a modles for the bones and the muscle fiber ie: early skeletal muscles form around it.
Youn do you mate are just you're trying to propagate your delusion and aren't going to accept anything even if its proven its not special amongst atheist darwanist apologist to gasslight yourself reality to retardation and act like
An incompetent imbecile with ego issues
You keep blaming me for gish galloping yet you can't provide clear answers or even address. Logic
pointing at similarity with the intention to find a common ancestor (which you clearly did and keep running away from and gas lighting yourself like a bitchy clown) is homology and you are just too much of an ape mentally to process that
Whats low is that a twat with such puny reasoning skills has the gal to point fingers and and say "YOU ARE USING ASSUMPTIONS FOR DIFFERN DESCENT TOO".. shows how much of a intellectual weasel you are using
This whole time me and @Photon have been providing evidences that there are assumptions fundamentally involved in Ape-Human ancestry and you cannot which cannot be used to project a certain HYPOTHESIS..
We never made a case of different descent we just proposed POSSIBLILTIES
Coz unlike your illiterate self-delusion monkey ass we realise and scientists reiterate " HYPOTHESIS REMAIN HYPOTHESIS UNTLE PROVEN TRUE FUNDAMENTALLY "
Here is what Johnathan Marks an Evoluthionsry Biologist and An atheist say about BIAS
" In other words, this apparent fact of nature – the overwhelming genetic similarity of human and ape – is a fact constructed from culture. That is not to say it is inaccurate or false; just that its meaning is far less obvious than it may appear superficially.
We make sense of the world, and of our place in it, culturally – and science provides more information for constructing that place. But like any other peoples, our own application of that information to the puzzle of our existence is strongly influenced by our non-scientific ideas, our pervasive folk ideologies of heredity. "
In a page where he debunks the notion of any significant to Human ape similarity and how inflated that DNA similarity notion is
https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/the-cultural-bias-of-genetics-2004-11
So yet again another atheist biologist not a darwanist twit liks you, proving that there are assumptions fundamental and logically involved
Every scientists comparing genome, retrovirus, fossils.. Has an initial hypothesis in mind
"oh look Similarities exist.. It must he due to commin descent"
- then they observe similarities
- and end uo with the same conclusion that similarity is due to commin descebt due to the observed similarities
-A circular reason
- on a probabilistic modle
- with a mechanism as controversial assumptive as Natrual selection
- coming to BIAS CONFIRMING CONCLUSIONS
That is human Aoe ancestry in a Nutshell
But obviously it will go over your head like anything and everything does..
Oh shit.. That is an instuktto anyone who does have a working head.