People,we need to be careful about some stuff we think."if someone is going to suffer,its better to kill them off" was an argument used to justify some evil shit not long ago.I'm not saying any of you here are doing it.Good intentions can lead to hell too.
Ah the age old debate of the morality of life. Who's life has more value? Which choice is more morally just? Here's a quick mortality test: there are 2 rooms and you have choose which room gets to live and the other dies. In one room there's 1000th people who no skills or talents. In the other room there are only 100 people but with essentially skills that will benefit human life in the long run. Who gets to live?
No? Ok now combine both rooms to get 1100 people and now there's a 3rd room with 3 of the people closest to you in your life. You gets to live now? Whichever you choose, people will call you a selfish psycho no matter what.
Ah the age old debate of the morality of life. Who's life has more value? Which choice is more morally just? Here's a quick mortality test: there are 2 rooms and you have choose which room gets to live and the other dies. In one room there's 1000th people who no skills or talents. In the other room there are only 100 people but with essentially skills that will benefit human life in the long run. Who gets to live?
No? Ok now combine both rooms to get 1100 people and now there's a 3rd room with 3 of the people closest to you in your life. You gets to live now? Whichever you choose, people will call you a selfish psycho no matter what.
Ah the age old debate of the morality of life. Who's life has more value? Which choice is more morally just? Here's a quick mortality test: there are 2 rooms and you have choose which room gets to live and the other dies. In one room there's 1000th people who no skills or talents. In the other room there are only 100 people but with essentially skills that will benefit human life in the long run. Who gets to live?
No? Ok now combine both rooms to get 1100 people and now there's a 3rd room with 3 of the people closest to you in your life. You gets to live now? Whichever you choose, people will call you a selfish psycho no matter what.
Ah the age old debate of the morality of life. Who's life has more value? Which choice is more morally just? Here's a quick mortality test: there are 2 rooms and you have choose which room gets to live and the other dies. In one room there's 1000th people who no skills or talents. In the other room there are only 100 people but with essentially skills that will benefit human life in the long run. Who gets to live?
No? Ok now combine both rooms to get 1100 people and now there's a 3rd room with 3 of the people closest to you in your life. You gets to live now? Whichever you choose, people will call you a selfish psycho no matter what.
For me it totally depends on the skills and if the individuals in question are actually going to use them for the benefit of humankind.
If yes,I'd go with scenario #2 and kill my loved ones including myself, because I couldn't live knowing I killed my loved ones but if it's for the benefit of everyone it's the right thing to do.
When it comes to Pro Life and Pro Choice, I consider myself neither for the most part, but Id choose Pro Choice with clear set boundaries overall. On one hand, you can't play God and takes lives whenever. In the other hand, you can't play God and dicate what people can do with their bodies. There are circumstances where abortion is absolutely necessary, and every horrible person in history started off as a baby no? I personally find taking away someone's right to choose regardless of circumstance unsavory.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.