It depends a lot on Tweet's flip, but if you actually scrutinise his reasoning today (which you haven't even begun doing) - you'd see he starts with a vague allusion to gamestate, then alters his position to where its currently at. He has plenty of deniability afterwards, bcause the reasoning he's put down hasn't actully tied him to anything concrete - he can simply cite wanting to bring the town back on track. Let me ask you this - why does he even bother linking us initially if he hd this strong a leaning anyway (he's barely shifted his perspective during ths supposed day 2 readback, either).
His angle is pretty simple - mislynch here, go back to Tweet, by then it's day 5.