What could woman actually do if men disappeared for day 5 years.
- Thread starter IsaziSempi
- Start date
Why ?
Fun fact for your historical knowledge: women before the neolithic were also hunter not only gatherer.
Another fun fact : During wars, women are usually taking men's gender identified role in society (factory/Arm weaponneny etc.)
Another fun fact : There is no work that men can do that women can't.
So.. women can perfectly strive without men. But the best out of this is that crime would instantly decrease.
Women would not build a paradise of course, but it would be something to see such a society strive.
Get rid of patriarchy, only capitalism is left.
ok, you gave your opinion, now refute thousands of years of human history which go against it 
Another fun fact : During wars, women are usually taking men's gender identified role in society (factory/Arm weaponneny etc.)
Another fun fact : There is no work that men can do that women can't.
So.. women can perfectly strive without men. But the best out of this is that crime would instantly decrease.
Women would not build a paradise of course, but it would be something to see such a society strive.
Get rid of patriarchy, only capitalism is left.
Nice, so who was actually fighting the wars again?
Correct, but men happen to be exponentially better at many of them
'Strive' is way too strong a word to use lol
Yes, potentially. Unless it doesn't, since men are also the ones who stop most of the crimes, and in this scenario crime would be easier to commit because all the potential victims are women, and there's no men to save them.
Correct, but men happen to be exponentially better at many of them
'Strive' is way too strong a word to use lol
Yes, potentially. Unless it doesn't, since men are also the ones who stop most of the crimes, and in this scenario crime would be easier to commit because all the potential victims are women, and there's no men to save them.
Most of the men and some of the women that were not prohibited to fight. :)
Only because of the survivor bias. Actually there is no difference.
I'm sure this was done in scientific fashion and not just women thrawn into an island. I'm sure we are talking about a representative chunk of the society and women so around 2000/3000 and not just a group of ten ? Right ?
I'm sure you understand that women are systematically pulled out of power places such as cops or politician ? RIght ? So without men, women would take the role.. maybe with less brutality in fact. You would therefore also see a dicrease in police violences and brutalities.
Only because of the survivor bias. Actually there is no difference.
I'm sure this was done in scientific fashion and not just women thrawn into an island. I'm sure we are talking about a representative chunk of the society and women so around 2000/3000 and not just a group of ten ? Right ?
I'm sure you understand that women are systematically pulled out of power places such as cops or politician ? RIght ? So without men, women would take the role.. maybe with less brutality in fact. You would therefore also see a dicrease in police violences and brutalities.
