Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine are you having fun al? are you having van al? dei has never hurt anyone you jackass dei must go gaolang > your fav hi rej hi rejj hi rejjj is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? life goal sister harem real madrid reloaded is innocent tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you watch for haters weebs discussing politics lmao worst thread ever
You asked to show an example of how 99% of governments in the world based their own laws on Liberalism and I showed you a whole map that illustrates how a majority of the world’s governments are secular even if their population is religious. If you don’t understand that, that ain’t my problem. You were doing well but now you just fumbled the whole bag.
H
I really wonder if other countries don't have better laws about protesting.
Here in Brazil you need Governament approve. They will shut down a street. Protesters will have police protection. But there will be other ways to move around the city. So the traffic will get worse but no one will be blocked.
Also I'm hearing a theory that Oil Companies like Shell, Texaco etc are financing this shitty so the movement looks stupid and generates hate on people.
Secularism is straigth bullshit
Here in Brazil you need Governament approve. They will shut down a street. Protesters will have police protection. But there will be other ways to move around the city. So the traffic will get worse but no one will be blocked.
Also I'm hearing a theory that Oil Companies like Shell, Texaco etc are financing this shitty so the movement looks stupid and generates hate on people.
Post automatically merged:
Secularism is straigth bullshit
H
No it is impossible to do it.
People are moved by their religions.
One thing is you not obligate others to follow your religion. Other thing is to not execute, legislate and judge based on those beliefs given by your religion. A catholic never would(or at least never should) vote/accept gay marriage for example because their religion is strictly against it.
Just read my above comment.
Just to explain better. Gay marriage in the sense of Catholic Church marriage. Civil marriage is another thing.
People are moved by their religions.
One thing is you not obligate others to follow your religion. Other thing is to not execute, legislate and judge based on those beliefs given by your religion. A catholic never would(or at least never should) vote/accept gay marriage for example because their religion is strictly against it.
Post automatically merged:
Just read my above comment.
Just to explain better. Gay marriage in the sense of Catholic Church marriage. Civil marriage is another thing.