Anyone else finds Andrew Tate's downfall absolutely hilarious?

I recall an asshole who made this thread calming he has proper credentials to concretely say that tate is done for and that dipshit bas resorted to ad hominem instead

What happend to your credentials that you soo boastful about shoved em up in your asshole have you?




Clearly meant generally if you even properly read it

Its clear there is no reason to be had with mentally liquidated pompous retards here

Ofc i mean you lot

Scratch all you're claiming, guve me another good reason to think that you're mentally handicapped, that the judgeis soo incompetent to consider since the last 9 or so months and tell me why was Tate released from home arrest.
The court in Bucharest on Friday said the release comes on the grounds that the brothers do not leave the Municipality of Bucharest and Ilfov county without prior approval from the court
This is why it's pointless to argue with Tate fans. When he was given house arrest you guys though he won the case, now you guys are doing the same thing again. He's still being charged for his crimes, a house arrest lift doesn't mean he's not guilty.


Now, explain to me why we should believe he's not guilty despite hours of evidence coming directly from him stating otherwise? And please don't say "because he's a muslim". It's pathetic, I could never imagine defending someone just because they are part of "my group"
 
Tate is like somebody that sells drugs until he becomes rich and then starts preaching about it how bad it is to sell drugs.

Tate makes fun of people paying for OF and stuff, but he exploited that and those same people to become rich, by doing human trafficking and manipulating women.

And now he is preaching about morals…

How could you not like and follow someone like that, right? Lmao
 

Adam 🍎

Pretty Boy
β€Ž
Now, explain to me why we should believe he's not guilty despite hours of evidence coming directly from him stating otherwise? And please don't say "because he's a muslim". It's pathetic, I could never imagine defending someone just because they are part of "my group"
Cause they don't understand how courts work. You cant keep someone in jail/house arrest forever, so what you do is break it up, now its jail, then house arrest, then town - state and so on

Tate is fucked, question is will he snitch his mafia buddies or take jail time
 
Tate is like somebody that sells drugs until he becomes rich and then starts preaching about it how bad it is to sell drugs.

Tate makes fun of people paying for OF and stuff, but he exploited that and those same people to become rich, by doing human trafficking and manipulating women.

And now he is preaching about morals…

How could you not like and follow someone like that, right? Lmao
Funny thing is in this scenario if you want to preach about morals and being anti drugs I am cool with it as long as you admit you were part of the problem. I am all for second chances, but to then complain about being charged for drug trafficking? Despite countless of hours of you bragging about being a drug lord? LMAO

The matrix aint out to get you bro, your dumbass mouth is
 
Hey man you are the one mentioning gay sex twice now, maybe you have some deep secrets deep in your soul
A soul introspection is something a phony rape advocate like you should sit down and ponder over.. Or shove this thread up to fill your obsession for rape advocacy




This is why it's pointless to argue with Tate fans. When he was given house arrest you guys though he won the case, now you guys are doing the same thing again. He's still being charged for his crimes, a house arrest lift doesn't mean he's not guilty


Now, explain to me why we should believe he's not guilty despite hours of evidence coming directly from him stating otherwise? And please don't say "because he's a muslim". It's pathetic, I could never imagine defending someone just because they are part of "my group"

Do better than strawman us and i known Andrew before he became Muslims so don't give me that compassion bs

We never claimed he's truly free

Only and nitwit with an iq worm would not doubt his own claims of Andrew's conviction on the so called CONVICTING evidence out there for 9 months, when the judge when presented with evidence to either elongate House arrest or to regress it to jail CROSSES CHOOSES TO FREE ANDREW FROM HOUSE ARREST

Meaning

- he's not a flight risk or a danger to victims

- the evidence presented isn't convincing enough to detain him to prison coz ample evidence would mean ample reasons to run away


All that crap

Its that hard to figure out that the dude might not be what you believe

You mfs aren't even agnostic.. But rather entertaining YT videos as evidence knowing how long the case has been going and these video could have been taken into account

But no

You want us to believe you are pea-brained dumabass innt?
 
Last edited:
Funny thing is in this scenario if you want to preach about morals and being anti drugs I am cool with it as long as you admit you were part of the problem. I am all for second chances, but to then complain about being charged for drug trafficking? Despite countless of hours of you bragging about being a drug lord? LMAO
Fair enough, as long as the person would admit their fault, do their jail time and then use the money they made from that, to help solving the problem they were part of.

The matrix aint out to get you bro, your dumbass mouth is
What?
 
Top