Spoiler One Piece Chapter 1091 Spoilers Discussion
- Thread starter Absalom
- Start date
- Status
What's funny is that Mihawk is probably the only character us Zoro bros collectively wank but he's getting sweat-diffed by Oda 
While Shiryu at least got some feats against Garp
Are we sure Zoro is Oda's second fav char
While Shiryu at least got some feats against GarpAre we sure Zoro is Oda's second fav char
Because this is how matchups are decided
There WAS evidence of Zoro fighting a Yonko. There WAS the potential for it as a cool moment that could only be "guessed" as a possible means to deal with Kaido circumstantially (Oda would never let Zoro overshadow his MC, so killing him outside of a very strict cirumstance made no sense because Zoro isnt the Yonko, his captain is).
You guys were looking at color spreads of Zoro eating Ramen, misunderstanding "when" Enma needed to turn black (i.e. not Wano) based on how you interpreted english from Sukiyaki/Tenguyama, and using "Monsters" as a strict canon parallel to compare Zoro and Ryuuma to them cutting a dragons head off (when zoro already did it lmao) to justify this instead of just saying "hey, it 'might' be a cool thing that happens but I doubt it".
Even now you are trying to frame it like Oda had all the intention to do and didnt, which is just straight up maniacal lmfao.
Now you actually fucked up this logic, because Lucci quite literally is the leading example of being a follower:
Oh look, another example of Lucci being the dog he is!
But I guess that works for you now because Zoro is fighting Lucci
There WAS evidence of Zoro fighting a Yonko. There WAS the potential for it as a cool moment that could only be "guessed" as a possible means to deal with Kaido circumstantially (Oda would never let Zoro overshadow his MC, so killing him outside of a very strict cirumstance made no sense because Zoro isnt the Yonko, his captain is).
You guys were looking at color spreads of Zoro eating Ramen, misunderstanding "when" Enma needed to turn black (i.e. not Wano) based on how you interpreted english from Sukiyaki/Tenguyama, and using "Monsters" as a strict canon parallel to compare Zoro and Ryuuma to them cutting a dragons head off (when zoro already did it lmao) to justify this instead of just saying "hey, it 'might' be a cool thing that happens but I doubt it".
Even now you are trying to frame it like Oda had all the intention to do and didnt, which is just straight up maniacal lmfao.
Now you actually fucked up this logic, because Lucci quite literally is the leading example of being a follower:
Oh look, another example of Lucci being the dog he is!
But I guess that works for you now because Zoro is fighting Lucci
How likely do you think it is mihawk meets or surpasses the expectations sword stans put on him?
Like the King fight does meet my expectation but for some others it's a disappointment
Can't win it all I guess
People trying to justify Kizaru not being Luffy's opponent: Kizaru is a follower dog bitch, Luffy only fights leaders!
Lucci: I followed weakling Spandam and his every order to the letter at Enies Lobby
Edit: Let it be known that ALL the Gorosei also bow to someone else, so thats also hilarious.
Lucci: I followed weakling Spandam and his every order to the letter at Enies Lobby
Edit: Let it be known that ALL the Gorosei also bow to someone else, so thats also hilarious.
Last edited:
Because this is how matchups are decided
There WAS evidence of Zoro fighting a Yonko. There WAS the potential for it as a cool moment that could only be "guessed" as a possible means to deal with Kaido circumstantially (Oda would never let Zoro overshadow his MC, so killing him outside of a very strict cirumstance made no sense because Zoro isnt the Yonko, his captain is).
You guys were looking at color spreads of Zoro eating Ramen, misunderstanding "when" Enma needed to turn black (i.e. not Wano) based on how you interpreted english from Sukiyaki/Tenguyama, and using "Monsters" as a strict canon parallel to compare Zoro and Ryuuma to them cutting a dragons head off (when zoro already did it lmao) to justify this instead of just saying "hey, it 'might' be a cool thing that happens but I doubt it".
Even now you are trying to frame it like Oda had all the intention to do and didnt, which is just straight up maniacal lmfao.
Now you actually fucked up this logic, because Lucci quite literally is the leading example of being a follower:
Oh look, another example of Lucci being the dog he is!
But I guess that works for you now because Zoro is fighting Lucci
There WAS evidence of Zoro fighting a Yonko. There WAS the potential for it as a cool moment that could only be "guessed" as a possible means to deal with Kaido circumstantially (Oda would never let Zoro overshadow his MC, so killing him outside of a very strict cirumstance made no sense because Zoro isnt the Yonko, his captain is).
You guys were looking at color spreads of Zoro eating Ramen, misunderstanding "when" Enma needed to turn black (i.e. not Wano) based on how you interpreted english from Sukiyaki/Tenguyama, and using "Monsters" as a strict canon parallel to compare Zoro and Ryuuma to them cutting a dragons head off (when zoro already did it lmao) to justify this instead of just saying "hey, it 'might' be a cool thing that happens but I doubt it".
Even now you are trying to frame it like Oda had all the intention to do and didnt, which is just straight up maniacal lmfao.
Now you actually fucked up this logic, because Lucci quite literally is the leading example of being a follower:
Oh look, another example of Lucci being the dog he is!
But I guess that works for you now because Zoro is fighting Lucci
A devil fruit? Strong Haki?
He is not using his sword anymore it seems, like Kaku.
- Status