why does it have to be a named attack to be proof ? you want to claim zoro is being effortless . lucci is equally effortless.
parry/block I dont see too much of a difference.
You can make the argument now
there's no need to see anything else .
you bringing up kamazou helps my point
lucci and kamazo lose cause they are weaker not because "lethal swordsmen" have a crazy advantage over those who dont use those weapons.
Why are dudes clowning on Zoro for Lucci blocking his attack? Yeah Lucci was in base, but Zoro is using only armament haki and two swords.
Lucci was able to clash with G5 Luffy using armament haki as well.
The reason Lucci got low diff'd was because of massive CQC gap between himself and Luffy, he was able to contest with Luffy in direct clashes.
why does it have to be a named attack to be proof ? you want to claim zoro is being effortless . lucci is equally effortless.
parry/block I dont see too much of a difference.
You can make the argument now
there's no need to see anything else .
you bringing up kamazou helps my point
lucci and kamazo lose cause they are weaker not because "lethal swordsmen" have a crazy advantage over those who dont use those weapons.
What is the point of making him Yonko if Oda intends to let Luffy get 'owned' ?
That is basically shitting on his own writing. I know he shit on his own story many times but this is a new low. What purpose does it serve if Luffy loses here? repeat of Saboady?
That is not CoC attack. CoC trails are way thicker. This is just hardening attack similar to Chinjao clash, Luffy vs Lucci or even Ulti vs Luffy head butt.
Luffy the emperor is not getting owned by anyone, this fight is to prove to the world he belongs, Oda already had multiple characters question Luffy's position and crew.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.