Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine #votebluenomatterwhat are you having fun al? are you having van al? gaolang > your fav imagine thinking trump is the good guy is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? it's over for trump life goal sister harem loli mfw kamala harris can actually win real madrid reloaded is innocent tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you worst thread ever
No internet on Gaza,we will probably not get any covering of the conflict(aside from reporters).
A reddit user posted this,it makes sense imo
"Are night time raids possibly Israelis long term strategy here?
Almost every single vehicle on that video has thermal or night vision capability for driver, gunner and commander.
The air assets such as drones, apaches and fighter jets all have that capability as well as being all networked together with infantry and vehicles through some proprietary system they developed which I forgot the name of.
The infantry most likely doesn't have enough of night vision vision for everyone, but I assume much more than in 2014."
At night, most of the civilians that are still in the area would be inside, meaning any Hamas militant near the contact line would stand out like a Christmas tree on thermals. As well as any kind of movement deeper in the city for either vehicles or militants that are moving anywhere.
And a huge advantage would be in the fight against drones, since most of the smaller DJI types for recon or dropping smaller grenades won't have any thermal capability, and neither are the $10,000 heavy payload drones that can carry standard rpg HEAT or tandem warheads guaranteed to have thermals. This would overall almost nullify most of the drones effect.
Post automatically merged:
A reddit user posted this,it makes sense imo
"Are night time raids possibly Israelis long term strategy here?
Almost every single vehicle on that video has thermal or night vision capability for driver, gunner and commander.
The air assets such as drones, apaches and fighter jets all have that capability as well as being all networked together with infantry and vehicles through some proprietary system they developed which I forgot the name of.
The infantry most likely doesn't have enough of night vision vision for everyone, but I assume much more than in 2014."
At night, most of the civilians that are still in the area would be inside, meaning any Hamas militant near the contact line would stand out like a Christmas tree on thermals. As well as any kind of movement deeper in the city for either vehicles or militants that are moving anywhere.
And a huge advantage would be in the fight against drones, since most of the smaller DJI types for recon or dropping smaller grenades won't have any thermal capability, and neither are the $10,000 heavy payload drones that can carry standard rpg HEAT or tandem warheads guaranteed to have thermals. This would overall almost nullify most of the drones effect.
Last edited:
Propaganda battle is raging on...
Paraguay surprised me here.
@NikaInParis thoughts?
Post automatically merged:
Paraguay surprised me here.
Post automatically merged:
@NikaInParis thoughts?
Last edited:
That random Saudi's opinion has as much weight as any other uneducated person's.
Whatsmore, him being Saudi is used as some sort of gotcha by the poster as if random twotter Saudi = general opinion
The more problematic thing there is the dehumanization of Gazan's - like there being a reason a single Gazan won't be taken in by Arab nations is a clear atempt at dehumanizing Gazans in the eyes of the uninitiated.
E.g. "Look, not even fellow Arabs won't them. The problem is clearly in the Gazan's nature."
Whatsmore, him being Saudi is used as some sort of gotcha by the poster as if random twotter Saudi = general opinion
The more problematic thing there is the dehumanization of Gazan's - like there being a reason a single Gazan won't be taken in by Arab nations is a clear atempt at dehumanizing Gazans in the eyes of the uninitiated.
E.g. "Look, not even fellow Arabs won't them. The problem is clearly in the Gazan's nature."
I don't agree with his argument about Palestinians having no claim to the land.I don't take religion as a valid claim.Jews were long expelled from the region and Palestinians were living in that land before being expelled from there.Now,i do agree with what he said about Hamas.They ain't doing any good for anyone,they need to go.
Had the countries of Europe met the Jews with acceptance and not subjected them to recurring pogroms and general discrimination, there would be no need for a Jewish state, just saying. And now the West uses Israel and the Jews as tools to increase and stabilise Western political influence in the Middle East. It's such bitter irony.
Ofc they won't, that's literally the whole point why i bring that up in the first place. They know it's natural for Arabs to act the way they did because they admitted themselves they stole the land. They technically admitted that they were the aggressor, but they think they can get away with that because apparently their god promised the land for them
