You literally called me a rightist( per your own word you don't believe in center) so yeah you think I am a conservative
Yes, but rightist are not necessarly conservatives. Conservative are inbetween the liberals and the far right. You are more like a liberal than a conservative.


My comment is simple, gatekeeping discussions is stupid and unproductive.
And when do I gatekeep discussions ? oO


Wait so the UN =international law? I am pretty sure ISIS is considered a terrorist org by the UN lol.
I don't think so. international laws are the list of treaties and laws between the nations, its not an organization.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_law
But some organisations can have the power to apply international laws.


If being a liberal is being rightist in your own world then nah I am good where I am at. Again, you're in your own world
Well yeah.. liberalism is the entry of the right. Its not for nothing that Macron is now called a rightis by leftists in France while coming from a socialist party.

But With Jesus powers he would make all people no longer question there identities.
FOr that, Jesus would need to change people vision of identities and the entire system. Aren't your ideologies based on "free will" ?
 
And lets transphobe say that trans are ill
They are ill. The issue is what sort of treatment is acceptable. Mutilation and change of society to conform to others delusions is not acceptable for some people.
should detransition
If @Okamakama was not happy with his decision and decided to detransition, it's his own decision and you have no say about it. Him and others using their own experience as a argument against transition is his right. You should at least respect the right of people to affirm themselves.

should seek help
Yes. People with actual gender dysphoria should seek and find help. If the help is effective and make them live better lives, you should be the least qualified to talk about it.

And, yes. The struggle of those with gender dysphoria is real. The reality of their situation is real and they exist (I know people that had it before it was a fad and that's why I don't call them trans, since I respect them). This does not make they magically turn into something other than what they are. And most, if not all, of those that I find that actually suffer from that are incredible people that accept that.

And lets sexist deny researches on the oppression of women and spit fallacious and false idea about the the conditions of men on earth
You seem to love talk about research and also ignoring the ones that actually are contrary to what you believe. This does not help your argument. Some points mentioned by @Okamakama are real and confirmed by data, ignoring those just make you look biased and takes away from your talking points.

And let genocide apologizer says that bombing an entire closed off city is just a normal response ?
This is stupid and ignores reality. Acknowledging that a superior and powerful state may resort to extreme tactics is normal in international relations and sometimes even a good tactic does not make someone a genocide apologizer. If we are going to talk about politics and international relations we may have to consider what a state that follows neo-realism may do.

And let far rightist developp their propaganda on guns/religions/minorities/economy/politic ?
For someone that hates propaganda, you love your talking points. Do you know the concept of irony?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Zolo

Cope Doctor
Yes, but rightist are not necessarly conservatives. Conservative are inbetween the liberals and the far right. You are more like a liberal than a conservative.



And when do I gatekeep discussions ? oO



I don't think so. international laws are the list of treaties and laws between the nations, its not an organization.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_law
But some organisations can have the power to apply international laws.



Well yeah.. liberalism is the entry of the right. Its not for nothing that Macron is now called a rightis by leftists in France while coming from a socialist party.


FOr that, Jesus would need to change people vision of identities and the entire system. Aren't your ideologies based on "free will" ?
He would make people no longer question, all people would know who they are, man or woman, they would not have any doubt about themselves, they would feel fine and well
 
it's his own decision and you have no say about it
Did you see somewhere where I question his descision ? No. Nowhere. I didn't. That was his choice. What is problematic is what he is saying now.


You should at least respect the right of people to affirm themselves.
You can affirm yourself without denying the identity of others

People with actual gender dysphoria should seek and find help. If the help is effective and make them live better lives, you should be the least qualified to talk about it
i'm actually for people with gender disphoria to seek help. But what you are not understanding is that gender disphoria is something that can't be resolve by refusing our identity. It only makes it worse. That's why the way to heal gender disphoria is gender affirming care and in some case, a physical transition.

I don't think you understandthat I'm for trans right here

*********************************************************************
So, I reported you for you first paragraph, but I wasn't expecting such an abject sentence. You get one other report free of charges.


You seem to love talk about research and also ignoring the ones that actually are contrary to what you believe.
When I talk about research, I'm talking about the consensus mate. You can of course have random research denying trans right pop out here and there, but they won't be credible.


I know people that had it before it was a fad and that's why I don't call them trans, since I respect them
Dude.. the last thing you need to do to a person with gender disphoria is denying their trans identity..

:lawsigh::lawsigh::lawsigh::lawsigh::lawsigh:

holy fudge...


This is stupid and ignores reality. Acknowledging that a superior and powerful state may resort to extreme tactics is normal in international relations and sometimes even a good tactic does not make someone a genocide apologizer.
Yes it does


For someone that hates propaganda, you love your talking points. Do you know the concept of irony?
Are my talking point spreading hatred and denying the identity of others ? No. So get off your high horse.


Why do people even respond to C4N?We have literally 100s of pages of this.Enough already.
Maybe because you can't stand someone fighting for the right of other people without giving up ?
 
Top