Controversial General Political Discussion

[Gaimon The Pirate]

Guys,get to work. You guys keep fighting c4n and forget this dude has nothing better to do. Don't waste time.

It's worse than fighting Windmills.
It's fighting imaginary windmills that call you a homophobe just because they have never seen a woman in real life.

 

[Logiko]

So when i post a definition to building because you are not using it correctly thats also an obsession over transphobic definitions?

?

No. I just care about how words are defined

Oh that I understood that you cared more about definitions than the actual reality.

It is, there is no gamete beyond male and female

Not really not. But I guess you will need to ask that to actual scientist, I'm not a expert on the subject.

Well its not surprising to be called that by you lmao.

I'm sure

Only the "bad" countries are in agreetment with you.

Is south Africa a bad country ?

Just seeing some of the names of the countries that are in favor of those claims against the ones who are against it is enough to know which side is the right one.

Indeed.. what I see is countries which have an history of being colonizer being pro Israel. This is actually not very surprising.

And the fact that problematic country roots for Palestine shouldn't be a surprise either as their have found the one thing pro democracy state are being hypocrite about.

So none of this is surprising. You are just supporting the hypocrite and those who defend a genocide.

It's fighting imaginary windmills that call you a homophobe just because they have never seen a woman in real life.

Maybe don't become an architect.

 

[Monkey D Theories]

Guys,get to work. You guys keep fighting c4n and forget this dude has nothing better to do. Don't waste time.

I’m convinced most of the people here are jobless

 

[Logiko]

I’m convinced most of the people here are jobless

I wonder why they are so focus on me not having a job..

 

[Monkey D Theories]

I wonder why they are so focus on me not having a job..

Not just you

I think most people who post vigorously here have nothing better to do

 

[Bisoromi Bear]

Stuuuuu*p*id

 

[NAMELESS]

I’m convinced most of the people here are jobless

my problem is that i'm glued to the phone compute 24/7 due to work so sometimes i procrastinate here

 

[Zenos7]

Oh that I understood that you cared more about definitions than the actual reality.

Ridiculous strawman

 

[NAMELESS]

Guys,lets start a campaign for unemployed worstgen users.

 

[Logiko]

Ridiculous strawman

No, just the fact. You prefer to stick to the dictionnary definition of gender rather than the one of science.
Therefore you care more about a definition than reality itself.

 

[Zenos7]

No, just the fact. You prefer to stick to the dictionnary definition of gender rather than the one of science.
Therefore you care more about a definition than reality itself.

Nah, doesnt remotely make sense, and contrary to past claims of yours about scientific definitions.

No consistency, no logic, just lame ass buzz words.

Get over it, we have definitions for gender based on sex and the resulting gender roles and one based on gender identity. This has nothing to do with preferring definitions over science. And still, deviating from dictionary definition and using whatever you want defeats the purpose of language.

 

[Logiko]

Nah, doesnt remotely make sense, and contrary to past claims of yours about scientific definitions.

In what way dear boy ?

Get over it, we have definitions for gender based on sex and the resulting gender roles and one based on gender identity.

Yes, in dictionnaries. Not in science and therefore those definitions don't define reality but the heteronormative vision that some of the humans have of the reality of gender.

Therefore you prefer to defend a bias vision of reality over the way reality really is. Which, don't get me wrong, would be okay if you were not ignoring existing people's identities in the process.

I just uncovered you enbyphobia. Its okay. Its seems you will be protected here.

 

[Zenos7]

In what way dear boy ?


Yes, in dictionnaries. Not in science and therefore those definitions don't define reality but the heteronormative vision that some of the humans have of the reality of gender.

Therefore you prefer to defend a bias vision of reality over the way reality really is. Which, don't get me wrong, would be okay if you were not ignoring existing people's identities in the process.

I just uncovered you enbyphobia. Its okay. Its seems you will be protected here.

Nah bro. Its you who is using bias over how words are actually used. Im not denying any identity or reality either. I literally mentioned more than once that i used to correct people on the 2 genders because i thought the gender identity definition is the only valid one currently. I mentioned more than once the legitimacy of transgenderism. I can accept all of these scientific concepts without having the need to use words contrary to their actual meaning.

But please throw more buzz words around without any substance.

And hit me up when definitions change to the meaning you want to ascribe to the words.
[automerge]1705447696[/automerge]

Its seems you will be protected here.

Rightfully so, you want me punished over using words correctly lmao

 

[Logiko]

Im not denying any identity or reality either.

Yes you are.

i thought the gender identity definition is the only valid

Its the only valid one in regards to reality

I mentioned more than once the legitimacy of transgenderism

And yet you continue to defend an enbyphobic definition

ut please throw more buzz words around without any substance.

As you wish

Rightfully so, you want me punished over using words correctly lmao

In depend, if for you "correct" is contrary to reality and an ignorance of the identities of others then yes its correct academically but unethical

 

[Monkey D Theories]

my problem is that i'm glued to the phone compute 24/7 due to work so sometimes i procrastinate here

I used to post way more. Then I got hired. Now I don’t really have time to post to a of threads or do a ton of pointless back to back arguments with people.

Even though I still find time to occasionally do that.

 

[Zenos7]

Its the only valid one in regards to reality

No it isnt
[automerge]1705469334[/automerge]

And yet you continue to defend an enbyphobic definition

Nah
[automerge]1705469477[/automerge]

if for you "correct" is contrary to reality and an ignorance of the identities of others then yes its correct academically but unethical

Nah

You are just peddling non-sequiturs and strawmen
[automerge]1705469893[/automerge]
gender
/ (ˈdʒɛndə) /

noun

1. a set of two or more grammatical categories into which the nouns of certain languages are divided, sometimes but not necessarily corresponding to the sex of the referent when animate: See also natural gender
   
   
2. any of the categories, such as masculine, feminine, neuter, or common, within such a set
   

There are even more valid definitions. These just use different context. And on the definition thats linked to sex, are you denying that there are socially constructed roles in regards to male and female? Guess your precious sociology only matters when convenient. Double standards¹⁰

 

[Bisoromi Bear]

OH GOOOOD YOU'RE STILL GOING AT IT

 

[NAMELESS]

OH GOOOOD YOU'RE STILL GOING AT IT

Gender wars will never die.

 

[Logiko]

No it isnt

Yes it is. Sorry mate.

Nah

You can go "nah" all you want. What you wrote is still here, everyone can check.

Nah

You are just peddling non-sequiturs and strawmen

Sure. Tell yourself that

gender
/ (ˈdʒɛndə) /

noun

1. a set of two or more grammatical categories into which the nouns of certain languages are divided, sometimes but not necessarily corresponding to the sex of the referent when animate: See also natural gender
   
   
2. any of the categories, such as masculine, feminine, neuter, or common, within such a set

There are even more valid definitions. These just use different context.

Well, this one is closer to reality at least

are you denying that there are socially constructed roles in regards to male and female?

"Male" and "femelle" are referencing to sexual characteristic, its not about gender. There are indeed constructed gender role in "regards" to "men" and "women", there are also different genders.

But this a little bit too much for you this time I think

 

[Zenos7]

What you wrote is still here, everyone can check.

Bruh no one agrees with you xD i was one of few peeps here going against "there are two genders" alongside you before checking the definition lmfao
[automerge]1705501694[/automerge]

"Male" and "femelle" are referencing to sexual characteristic, its not about gender. There are indeed constructed gender role in "regards" to "men" and "women", there are also different genders.

But this a little bit too much for you this time I think

I never said male or female arent about sex. Toddler level reading comprehension.

Female and male are about sex. Gender roles are about the social constructs that revolve around the sexes. That is the first definition in the link i shared.

You insist on the definition that is about gender identity. If you use that one, there are obviously more than two genders. Not in the definition about gender roles though.

And the definition about grammar has 2 or more, heavily depending on qhat language we are talking about. In my native language german, we have 3 grammatical genders for example.

This really isnt much, so its amazing how you cant understand this lmfao.
[automerge]1705501948[/automerge]

*sexes

Just one example^