Controversial Akainu Is Not A Fascist, Featuring Ryokugyu

Elder Lee Hung

Conqueror of the Stars
#1
Hello everyone,

So we were having an incredibly civil and productive discussion with zero insults being thrown around, and we got into the topic of fascism, and just who is and is not a fascist in One Piece. And the discussion got pretty poppin so I figured this deserved its own thread. Politics on a weeb forum, this will be fun right?

So there seems to be some misconceptions about what fascism is, so we’re going to clear this up today and I’m going to explain to you why Akainu is not a fascist, and anyone who thinks Akainu is a fascist is wrong.

So let’s start by explaining what fascism is not:

Fascism =/= all evil. You see, what Akainu haters do is they look at Akainu and they say “oh he’s so evil, he’s clearly a fascist.” And, that’s not even remotely close to the definition of fascism. So let’s talk about fascism itself.

The first major tenant of fascism is deluded patriotism: a fierce pride in your nation not as it exists in actuality, but as you’ve deluded yourself into believing it exists. How does Ryokugyu fit this definition?


Ryokugyu is very proud of the Celestial Dragons who he describes as gods. Now of course the Celestial Dragons are not actual gods, they are gods in the propaganda sense. IE, they tell everyone they are gods to legitimize their rule.

But look at how fervently Ryokugyu believes that the Celestial Dragons are gods. He literally screams it into the face of the Wano natives, he is that confident and proud of this idea.

Ryokugyu is deluded, and he is very patriotic about his delusion. This is textbook fascism. What does Akainu think of the Celestial Dragons and his superiors in the World Government?


This is pretty clearly not how someone like Ryokugyu would address beings who he believes to be gods, by questioning their decision making to their faces. So again, we don’t see the same level of deluded patriotism from Akainu as we see from Ryokugyu. He is very aware that the Gorosei and the World Government has its flaws.

Ryokugyu also seems to have a pretty deluded patriotism toward the Marines:


The first time I read this comment, I remember finding it very weird that Ryokugyu would so readily associate himself with the Navy like this, because not only did Ryokugyu only just join the Navy two years ago, but the fact that Ryokugyu would do this at all suggests pride in the fact that he is a Marine. This pride must necessarily stem from the fact that Ryokugyu believes the Marines to be a more extreme and thus more effective military under Sakazuki as opposed to Sengoku (or else he would’ve joined the Marines before the draft). Which again to me is just a really deluded belief…Sakazuki’s Navy really doesn’t operate any differently from the way Sengoku’s did, but again Ryokugyu has a deluded level of patriotism for the Navy just because “his guy” is in charge now. Again we see a deluded patriotism in action.

Another major tenant of fascism is a hierarchical worldview: the belief that your race/culture/state is inherently superior to all others and thus deserves to rule over them. How does Ryokugyu fit this tenant?


By literally stating that human hierarchy exists and it is a good thing that hierarchy exists. This is crucially different from those who believe there is a human hierarchy but that all humans should be legislated/treated equal anyway. Ryokugyu explicitly believes in the merits of discrimination. This is fascism.

So what does Akainu think about hierarchy? Well, it’s sort of unclear but there’s no indication that he believes this shit lol. Akainu’s only worldview is that “all criminals = evil,” which is probably something that most fascists would agree with but isn’t itself a fascist belief. Communists and fascists probably agree that the sky is blue, but that doesn’t make a blue sky a fascist or communist belief (not saying Akainu is a communist lmfao).

No, if anything, Akainu’s words to the Gorosei, “why does the whole world have to be played for fools for Doflamingo” suggests not only that he does not have an unfailing faith in his government, but also that his worldview is nowhere near as hierarchical as Ryokugyu’s (Ryokugyu probably gives no shits about the vast majority of the world or even the world government nations being played for fools).

Now there are of course more tenants to fascism such as conservative autocracy, self-sacrifice for the benefit of the race or state, a strongly regimented society, etc but we won’t be discussing that here. Let’s instead look at what beliefs Akainu and Ryokugyu have in common:

The only beliefs that Akainu and Ryokugyu seem to share that can be associated with fascism is the use of force to suppress opposition. Which is not even close to an exclusively fascist belief, any authoritarian government believes in this principle. This in and of itself is not exclusive to fascism while the tenants I listed above are definitionally fascist.

I always said the introduction of Ryokugyu was a huge moment for Akainu’s character, because Ryokugyu really is the deluded maniac that haters thought Akainu was. Akainu’s fans of course know better, but this is Oda’s way of reinforcing how dangerous Akainu’s ideology of “all criminals = evil” is, because it attracts the true maniacs like Ryokugyu.

Anyway I’ll start to really ramble if this continues. Share your thoughts.

@SakazOuki @MarineHQ @Kurozumi Wiwi @The White Crane @Wuuuke @silverfire @scoobie3 @AkainuTheGrimReaper @Apollo @Admiral Mou Bu @ZenZu @Extravlad @kurwa @haxxor @EmperorKinyagi @Blackbeard @Owl Ki @TheKnightOfTheSea @God Buggy @Sentinel @Playa4321 @Veku @Le Fishe D. Tomdou @GoldDiamond @Dragon777 @Weeman @Cadis Etrama Di Urek @Dark Admiral @Rumble @Mathias @Gaimon The Pirate
 
#2
It’s annoying that people in general (not just in the OP community) seem to think fascism equates to just authoritarianism plus “evil”, when that’s far too imprecise and doesn’t actually delineate clearly fascist ideologies from plain old authoritarian ideologies.

The difference between Ryokugyu and Akainu is a good way to understand the difference in general. Both are authoritarian and “evil,” but Akainu clearly views the world hierarchy as necessary evil to combat criminals, whereas Ryokugyu views the world hierarchy as a good thing in and of itself.

Great thread, I really liked it.

And now let me ruin this post by saying one last thing: Shanks is the god king baby.
 
Last edited:
#3
Sakazuki is the one Admiral (not including Issho who's basically just a Revolutionary at this point) that seems to not really be a Marine to protect the WG/CDs, but more of just to purge pirates and what not.
His backstory will probably elaborate on that.
The others seem to be, well, bootlickers.
 

Elder Lee Hung

Conqueror of the Stars
#6
Anyone who supports a fascist regime intentionally and knowingly is a fascist by action. Akainu is simply not a party leader, he's a loyal member of the WGs version of the SS.
So is Garp a fascist then? Garp has defended the celestial dragons more than any Admiral has. Lol

And by extension Gold Roger is a fascist too right? These guys protected the Celestial Dragons after all.
 
#7
Sakazuki is the one Admiral (not including Issho who's basically just a Revolutionary at this point) that seems to not really be a Marine to protect the WG/CDs, but more of just to purge pirates and what not.
His backstory will probably elaborate on that.
The others seem to be, well, bootlickers.
Only Ryokugyu is clearly a boot licker.

Sakazuki, Issho, and Kuzan are clearly more complex characters than that.

Borsalino’s character at the moment is all over the place but I don’t think he serves the WG out of a moral obligation or anything like that or glazes CDs
 
#8
So is Garp a fascist then? Garp has defended the celestial dragons more than any Admiral has. Lol

And by extension Gold Roger is a fascist too right? These guys protected the Celestial Dragons after all.
Garps a fascist yes indeed. Not every member of the Nazi party was carted off after Nuremberg, and there are plenty of stories of people saving jews working inside of death camps.

Gol D. Roger made a temporary alliance with Garp to dunk on Rocks. Very different than signing your life over to the marines.
 
#9
Garps a fascist yes indeed. Not every member of the Nazi party was carted off after Nuremberg, and there are plenty of stories of people saving jews working inside of death camps.

Gold Roger made a temporary alliance with Garp to dunk on Rocks. Very different than signing your life over to the marines.
This just muddies “fascist” and makes it a useless term
 

Elder Lee Hung

Conqueror of the Stars
#10
Garps a fascist yes indeed.
I applaud your consistency. Lol

Gold Roger made a temporary alliance with Garp to dunk on Rocks. Very different than signing your life over to the marines.
He couldn’t have let Rox destroy the Celestial Dragons and then dunked on him afterward? Lol
Post automatically merged:

This just muddies “fascist” and makes it a useless term
By his definition fascist simply means “anyone affiliated with the WG in any way” lol
 
#13
I applaud your consistency. Lol



He couldn’t have let Rox destroy the Celestial Dragons and then dunked on him afterward? Lol
No because then Rocks gets first pick on all the devil fruits, and revokes his Garp back up for the most stacked crew we've seen yet.
This just muddies “fascist” and makes it a useless term
Destroying Ohara + it's evacuating citizens with no remorse for a fascist regime isn't enough to make someone a fascist?
 
#14
So is Garp a fascist then? Garp has defended the celestial dragons more than any Admiral has. Lol

And by extension Gold Roger is a fascist too right? These guys protected the Celestial Dragons after all.
Yes, he's a collaborationist. Roger can do whatever he wants, he's not faking being lawful. Garp know who is he working for, but instead of quitting his job he's sorta trying to change it from inside which is half stupid
 

WalnutTax

A man, my son 🌊
‎‎‎
#15
Good read, definitely a controversial subject in the community and I expect this thread to likely blow up on both sides (or get locked). Respect for taking your time in trying to think this through.

I would wager that Sakazuki strikes to me more so as an "Erwin Rommel" -esque guy and it has been clear time and time again that he is both frustrated by the friction of his higher ups and inability to be rain absolute justice everywhere 24/7. That does not excuse his actions such as Ohara, but it does give an explanation.

A great example of someone who "kept the peace" is Sengoku. Now THAT'S a whole other can of worms.
:chopoff:
 
Last edited:
#16
Only Ryokugyu is clearly a boot licker.

Sakazuki, Issho, and Kuzan are clearly more complex characters than that.

Borsalino’s character at the moment is all over the place but I don’t think he serves the WG out of a moral obligation or anything like that or glazes CDs
I don't know about Kuzan, after all he still didn't do anything to stop the raid on Ohara, but he didn't seem to really like it either.
Borsalino is definitely a bit of a CD bootlicker, he literally went to Sabaody to beat up the SHs for hurting a CD out of his own volition.
 
#17
Guy who blows up a ship of civilians just because there might be a "criminal". Burns books. Defends fascist regime.

I dunno. Seems close enough to fascism it's splitting hairs.

Pinochet was a right wing authoritarian. But not a fascist.
So are hardline communists fascists? What about militant religious states? Burning books =/= fascism

Lee is correct here, unless you wank to conflate “evil authoritarianism” with fascism and make it an objectively useless term, the clear demarcation is in the actual belief contents as opposed to the actions taken.
 
#20
So are hardline communists fascists? What about militant religious states? Burning books =/= fascism

Lee is correct here, unless you wank to conflate “evil authoritarianism” with fascism and make it an objectively useless term, the clear demarcation is in the actual belief contents as opposed to the actions taken.
I'd argue Akainu is a militant religious authoritarian. Considering the CDs view themselves as literal gods.


He's a right wing authotarian yes.
 
Top