if you notice that your work gets supported by nazis, its a good sign you should reconsider the political implications of what you're working on
Well.. that's a logical assertion.
If Nazi consider your work to be worthy of being shared to their sympathizers... you might wanna reconsider or at least recheck what you are working on.
"facts dont care about your feelings" statement
This video precisely demonstrate that this assertion is fallacious. You can't separate values from the scientific process, its impossible.
And if you try to do that.. well.. you will have good chances to be shared by Nazis.
surely nazis supported all kinda legit science
Are you certain about that assertion mate ? Do you think Nazi really care about social sciences or the reality of biology (for example) ? Remember that Nazi claimed to observe scientific proof of the hierarchy in the human "races"... You might wanna reconsider your statement "surely nazis supported all kinda legit science"...
.. i afraid to consider what this statement is making you right now...
No im not, other peeps here do though, and i was talking about them, not me. pretty rich for someone telling me to read more carefully
I read what you are saying mate, that's precisely the problem.
not as reliable as natural science =/= its unrealiable.
Its the same reliability. There is no hierarchization between scientific disciplines when clear results and conclusions are being reviewed and published. Your statement is anti scientific.
you cant just put migrant childen in regular classes and expect that to work when they dont even speak the language yet.
There are solutions and measures for that don't worry:
https://www2.ed.gov/policy/rights/guid/unaccompanied-children-2.pdf
i experienced first hand how this creates problems for schools and teachers.
What kind of problem ?
Is there an impossibility to pass on knowledge and education ? If that's the case there might be indeed a problem of structure. But the language barrier will never be the reason for it. There are always others political and more structural reasons.
nah thats not the point. it doesnt have anything to do with da vinci or the mona lisa. they just want to generate attention, thinking it will generate more attention if they do this to a famous painting (or monuments like they did in berlin).
Funnily enough, I think Leonardo - as open minded as he was - would have approved those kind of actions and even helped them in some ways.. I'm sure he would have been the kind of man to understand the issue and create a beautiful painting just for the sake of it being spashed by paint or soup. After all, what is art if not disruption ?
oof and his characterization of dawkins statement about eugenics is especially ridiculous and misleading.
Sure..
Because there is no other evidences of Dawkins strangely following those kind of ideologies...
https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/richard-dawkins-downs-syndrome-disability-b1848956.html
It was a meaningless display of vanity that did nothing except ruin the days of the people who came to see art.
Let me rephrase that :
Priviledged people were unable to see the work of one of the biggest disruptor this planet has ever carried and were "forced" to see "a disruptive act of activism" by two women trying to bring attention on the fact that 1 out of 3 french skip meal because of poverty and that farmers are dying while working..
But keep thinking that this is a "vanity display"
:cheers:
Like imagine paying for a movie you were really hyped for. Say Avengers Endgame. And right when the avengers were about to fight thanos, a bunch of activists walked in front of the stage and started shouting Free Palestine.
Well, I would walk on the stage and scream with them or at least applaud them of course ! Why missing an occasion to make people understand that a literal genocide is happening ?
The avengers waited 5 years, they can wait one more day don't worry.
a difference between strategic activism, and being annoying in public.
Those are the same things. There is no activism if its not annoying.
The purpose is to break the status co and the inaction. Breaking those things is always annoying.. what are you talking about mate ?
that any publicity is good
Indeed
Sarcasm or not, Not every painting out there that's been targeted by these types have had such a thing to protect it.
Yes they did. Unless you are talking about this one:
(but I don't think it was a leftist militant act
)