Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine are you having fun al? are you having van al? dei has never hurt anyone you jackass dei must go gaolang > your fav hi rej hi rejj hi rejjj is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? life goal sister harem real madrid reloaded is innocent tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you watch for haters weebs discussing politics lmao worst thread ever
Look up the word prejudice. I don't know why you're pissy I called it dangerous then 
US and Mexico/Brazil crime cannot be approached the same way cause they have a different set of issues. I'm arguing for gun regulation in the US, while you're saying it wouldn't do anything by using the example of Brazil. Except that Brazil and the US are completely, completely different in crime nature, corruption, and law execution, and the same solution is not possible (right now).
US and Mexico/Brazil crime cannot be approached the same way cause they have a different set of issues. I'm arguing for gun regulation in the US, while you're saying it wouldn't do anything by using the example of Brazil. Except that Brazil and the US are completely, completely different in crime nature, corruption, and law execution, and the same solution is not possible (right now).
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309755075_Does_Gun_Control_Reduce_Violent_Crime
I can play this game too. Progressist havard scientits with biased frauds again.
Do gun control laws reduce violence? To answer this question, a city-level cross-sectional analysis was performed on data pertaining to every U.S. city with a population of at least 25,000 in 1990 (n = 1,078), assessing the impact of 19 major types of gun control laws, and controlling for gun ownership levels and numerous other possible confounders. Models were estimated using instrumental variables (IVs) regression to address endogeneity of gun levels due to reverse causality. Results indicate that gun control laws generally show no evidence of effects on crime rates, possibly because gun levels do not have a net positive effect on violence rates. Although a minority of laws seem to show effects, they are as likely to imply violence-increasing effects as violence-decreasing effects. There were, however, a few noteworthy exceptions: requiring a license to possess a gun and bans on purchases of guns by alcoholics appear to reduce rates of both homicide and robbery. Weaker evidence suggests that bans on gun purchases by criminals and on possession by mentally ill persons may reduce assault rates, and that bans on gun purchase by criminals may also reduce robbery rates.
[automerge]1707004696[/automerge]
The world spins around him,bunny man. C4N does whatever he wants.
I can play this game too. Progressist havard scientits with biased frauds again.
Do gun control laws reduce violence? To answer this question, a city-level cross-sectional analysis was performed on data pertaining to every U.S. city with a population of at least 25,000 in 1990 (n = 1,078), assessing the impact of 19 major types of gun control laws, and controlling for gun ownership levels and numerous other possible confounders. Models were estimated using instrumental variables (IVs) regression to address endogeneity of gun levels due to reverse causality. Results indicate that gun control laws generally show no evidence of effects on crime rates, possibly because gun levels do not have a net positive effect on violence rates. Although a minority of laws seem to show effects, they are as likely to imply violence-increasing effects as violence-decreasing effects. There were, however, a few noteworthy exceptions: requiring a license to possess a gun and bans on purchases of guns by alcoholics appear to reduce rates of both homicide and robbery. Weaker evidence suggests that bans on gun purchases by criminals and on possession by mentally ill persons may reduce assault rates, and that bans on gun purchase by criminals may also reduce robbery rates.
[automerge]1707004696[/automerge]
The world spins around him,bunny man. C4N does whatever he wants.
I think the gun debate is almost a moot point. Our political system is so messed up everyone in power is pushed too far right and too far left to meet in the middle and make any meaningful change in the US.
I'm starting to wonder if my real problem isn't with the left but the messed up system that has forced me into one corner that protects my family's rights and my financial needs the most.
[automerge]1707004836[/automerge]
OH and this other huge right. My parental rights to raise my children and not have the government interfere.
I'm starting to wonder if my real problem isn't with the left but the messed up system that has forced me into one corner that protects my family's rights and my financial needs the most.
[automerge]1707004836[/automerge]
OH and this other huge right. My parental rights to raise my children and not have the government interfere.
You realise it said this: There were, however, a few noteworthy exceptions: requiring a license to possess a gun and bans on purchases of guns by alcoholics appear to reduce rates of both homicide and robbery. Weaker evidence suggests that bans on gun purchases by criminals and on possession by mentally ill persons may reduce assault rates, and that bans on gun purchase by criminals may also reduce robbery rates.
Home schooling is illegal in Brazil.
[automerge]1707005096[/automerge]
did you even read the abstract you copied, cause that just proved my point
It said notable exceptions and says there is no correlation. Learn to read stuff and stop cherry picking.
[automerge]1707005122[/automerge]
Gun control and Nat is prejudiced against Mexicans and Brazilians.
[automerge]1707005096[/automerge]
did you even read the abstract you copied, cause that just proved my point
[automerge]1707005122[/automerge]
Gun control and Nat is prejudiced against Mexicans and Brazilians.
A few noteworthy exceptions
Exception: . a person or thing that is excluded from a general statement or does not follow a rule
Example: he always plays top tunes, and tonight was no exception
[automerge]1707005259[/automerge]
In those few places,yes?As a standard rule?NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
[automerge]1707005302[/automerge]
She said all Mexicans are drug dealers. Look it upim joking
[automerge]1707005377[/automerge]
I need to eat.Do you want to drop this?
Exception: . a person or thing that is excluded from a general statement or does not follow a rule
Example: he always plays top tunes, and tonight was no exception
[automerge]1707005259[/automerge]
In those few places,yes?As a standard rule?NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
[automerge]1707005302[/automerge]
She said all Mexicans are drug dealers. Look it upim joking
[automerge]1707005377[/automerge]
I need to eat.Do you want to drop this?
Last edited:
Yup, so it would reduce homicide rates if you banned guns to certain groups of people, and gun regulation does in fact lower the murder rates.
You made it easy
You made it easy
1-They buy illegal guns.
2-Drunk fools can't buy legal guns because chemical dependants can't buy guns,so they buy illegal guns.
So what did the Brazilian legislation achieve in reducing this type of crime?It didn't achieve anything,because they didn't adress illegal market.
Btw,i think training,education,background checks,mental health checks and so on are necessary to buy a firearm. And from time to time you should undergo everything again. Just like we do with our car legislation. The legislation is like that,but there are a few problems here:
1-They add in a "prove necessity" rule that makes it so pretty much anyone gets randomly denied,even if they did in fact suffer some kind of death thread. people need to help of theirs lawyers to buy guns here.
2-They tax guns a lot. So the victims of criminality(poor people) can only dream about legally buy a gun.
3-Concealed carry is pretty much non-existant from civillians. So you are pretty much defenseless while in the Streets.
I'm for Ar15s and shit but this is distant dream right now. I want the people i voted for to actually aprove some damn laws so our rights become solid right now. There is no juridical security concerning guns in Brazil. Legal guns could all be gone tomorrow.
[automerge]1707006049[/automerge]
Yes.I'm serious.The schools themselves can't choose what they will teach kids.Its the federal gov that decides what kids will be taught.This is communism for you.
Last edited: