Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine #votebluenomatterwhat are you having fun al? are you having van al? gaolang > your fav i refuse to pay my taxes imagine thinking trump is the good guy is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? it's over for trump life goal sister harem loli mfw kamala harris can actually win real madrid tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you worst thread ever
Listen,i can hear and write reasonably in English and i'm working on improving my speech. Barrier language is not the issue. Yeah,slurs are insulting. According to forums rules: baiting,cyber bully,calling names and so on should get you banned. Thing is that you guys didn't enforce this and some bad manners got normalized here. I think this forum actually lacks civility. its not just this thread,i see people calling each other retards over powerscaling and it seems nobody cares until things escalate into:" i will shoot you with my glock".
Dude quoting shit from 1952 as if science hasn't advanced and guidelines haven't been updated ever since. Being distressed over your sexual orientation doesn't mean you're mentally ill due to it, it's in reaction to something that might differ from cultural and societal expectations.
If you want real modern studies from real institutions then stop being disingenuous and read what they have to say, but you probably don't since it goes against what you believe it's true.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4771012/
You are a raging homophobe, at least own up to it.
If you want real modern studies from real institutions then stop being disingenuous and read what they have to say, but you probably don't since it goes against what you believe it's true.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4771012/
You are a raging homophobe, at least own up to it.
I'm so burned. Not. :holdthisl:
The raging homophobe literally has the whatsapp number of a gay users here and im talking to him like i talk to everyone else. You don't know me,pal. Stop projecting shit into me. If you use gay/faggot as in insult,its because you yourself thinks it a negative term(so does everyone else i know).
Last edited:
https://mashable.com/article/facebook-mark-zuckerberg-conservative-pages
facebook is left wing wtf
carrot, what's the deal thought all the status quo were far right nazis????
why they afarid of evil nazi men if they are fellow nazis
did the idealogical leftist pundit lie to me to push his dumb poltics, surely that's not possible
zucker just fears other nazis cause they are better at the art of facism.
trust me, some guy on twitter told me
facebook is left wing wtf
carrot, what's the deal thought all the status quo were far right nazis????
why they afarid of evil nazi men if they are fellow nazis
did the idealogical leftist pundit lie to me to push his dumb poltics, surely that's not possible
zucker just fears other nazis cause they are better at the art of facism.
trust me, some guy on twitter told me
Everyone and their mother calls each other faggot as an insult since the time of dinossaurs. I was talking about the insult itself and not the act of homosexuality. I wouldn't bang a dude. Bonny,hairy and stinky ass...fuck that,its gross.
I get the feeling you guys created this thread just for this.
Is being sick a fucking insult now? Are doctors bashing us all now? You can't make moral judgments about health issues.
Post automatically merged:
I get the feeling you guys created this thread just for this.
Post automatically merged:
Is being sick a fucking insult now? Are doctors bashing us all now? You can't make moral judgments about health issues.
"extreme Islamophobia" - lul
"He’s much too strong about the way he denies religion" said one scientist who got interviewed about dawkins in one of the sources. dawkins puts himself on a 6 at his 1-7 scale, so technically he is still an agnostic atheist. . .
"Ecklund said it is important to note that none of the scientists interviewed questioned Dawkins’ integrity as a scientist. Rather, they were critical of his representation of science to the public. "
and christopher hitchens isnt even a scientist himself, and his criticism of religion isnt based on science alot of the times.
and also lul at new atheism being right wing. not caring about political correctness and doing harsh criticism of religion doesnt make you right-wing.
so glossing over your sources, im not impressed. but well sure, i guess the "new atheists" do think science is the best way to acquire knowledge about our natural world. because, well, it is. and i dont think you disagree. or at least you shouldnt if you want to be consistent with the rest of your general claims.
nah, attacking the character instead of the argument IS a logical fallacy. no matter how much you want to rationalize it lmfao.
ye dont bother sharing french shit with me, unless it has proper english subtitles
"He’s much too strong about the way he denies religion" said one scientist who got interviewed about dawkins in one of the sources. dawkins puts himself on a 6 at his 1-7 scale, so technically he is still an agnostic atheist. . .
"Ecklund said it is important to note that none of the scientists interviewed questioned Dawkins’ integrity as a scientist. Rather, they were critical of his representation of science to the public. "
and christopher hitchens isnt even a scientist himself, and his criticism of religion isnt based on science alot of the times.
and also lul at new atheism being right wing. not caring about political correctness and doing harsh criticism of religion doesnt make you right-wing.
so glossing over your sources, im not impressed. but well sure, i guess the "new atheists" do think science is the best way to acquire knowledge about our natural world. because, well, it is. and i dont think you disagree. or at least you shouldnt if you want to be consistent with the rest of your general claims.
Post automatically merged:
nah, attacking the character instead of the argument IS a logical fallacy. no matter how much you want to rationalize it lmfao.
Post automatically merged:
ye dont bother sharing french shit with me, unless it has proper english subtitles
https://www.npr.org/2022/01/06/1070...nd-twitter-far-right-groups-lose-online-clout
Leftists status quo censored the right wing party on facebook
So much for a right wing status quo
Leftists status quo censored the right wing party on facebook
So much for a right wing status quo
you always rely on data and scientific researches?
scientism alert?!?!?
jokes aside, yeah no. i dont base my argumentation on any ideology. which is why you can find points of me agreeing with various ideologies, because i dont really subscribe to any one ideology myself. and i dont care to give examples for this again. there is only so much patience i have to repeat shit for you
well you gave me a source from a professor of religion on new atheism.
and how can you on one side say new atheism is paired with scientism and then say its becoming antiscientific?
as expected and predicted: convoluted nonsense
yes, im well aware, i studied both. and there was a complete lack of "woke" concepts in physics and math, but comparative religious science and educational science was full of it.
nah, im an actual science enthusiast. i do have my preferences regarding the field of science though. im not at all into chemistry, but alot into physics and biology.
is there a single poster you dont consider conservative?
i sure as hell dont consider myself conservative.
well you dont have to put all of it in one post. makes it almost as annoying to read as @Bob74h 's posts.
scientism alert?!?!?
jokes aside, yeah no. i dont base my argumentation on any ideology. which is why you can find points of me agreeing with various ideologies, because i dont really subscribe to any one ideology myself. and i dont care to give examples for this again. there is only so much patience i have to repeat shit for you
Post automatically merged:
well you gave me a source from a professor of religion on new atheism.
and how can you on one side say new atheism is paired with scientism and then say its becoming antiscientific?
as expected and predicted: convoluted nonsense
Post automatically merged:
yes, im well aware, i studied both. and there was a complete lack of "woke" concepts in physics and math, but comparative religious science and educational science was full of it.
Post automatically merged:
nah, im an actual science enthusiast. i do have my preferences regarding the field of science though. im not at all into chemistry, but alot into physics and biology.
Post automatically merged:
is there a single poster you dont consider conservative?
i sure as hell dont consider myself conservative.
Post automatically merged:
well you dont have to put all of it in one post. makes it almost as annoying to read as @Bob74h 's posts.
Last edited:
i agree with this stuff for once
thats also his MO
eh if you forgot you were just making a mistake, technically not lying. lying is when you say something incorrect knowing that it is incorrect. you just forgot something, no big deal
"faggot" is not just calling someone gay, its a very derogatory term
Post automatically merged:
thats also his MO
Post automatically merged:
eh if you forgot you were just making a mistake, technically not lying. lying is when you say something incorrect knowing that it is incorrect. you just forgot something, no big deal
Post automatically merged:
"faggot" is not just calling someone gay, its a very derogatory term
