@Monster Zoro's Tesla Supplier what happened you are silent about flame off? You are so scared that you will be rejected from ZKKfangirls loser club?
Ad.CoC is a fan term thats invented by fans like me while dumb ZKKlosers like you were denying its existence,
https://worstgen.alwaysdata.net/forum/threads/advanced-coc-discussion.11907/
do not try to tell me what is Ad.CoC you dumb clown, you don't know shit.
Kaido questioned Zolo has CoC right after he took his attack other than that Zolo did nothing about CoC. Kaido clearly said Zolo's attack has CoC, denying it will only make you more stupid. Zolo himself said he put everything he has in it.
Still Zolo's Asura didn't even make Kaido fall.
Alber was getting ragdolled left and right by Marco in 2 v 1 with Queen. He was always falling.
Kaido can use full Haki defense like he did vs Luffy, against Zolo Asura there was no red lightning:
No red lightning while taking Zolo's Ad.CoC attack.
-Alber's Flame off mode was proven to be shit by
Ryokugyu's random attack without going all out while fodderizing others at the same time.
Emperors doesn't have that flame off weakness.
-Zolo tells Lucci and Kaku can damage flame off Lunarians, they don't need Ad.coc
-Vegapunk tells
Franky laser can damage flame on Lunarian.
-Teach's
1 random darkness attack can damage flame on Lunarian.
-Law's attacks obviously shits on flame on Lunarians, and they can't stop Law's teleportation or other DF Hax.
Neither flame off or even flame on has any argument to be on same defense level as Emperors Haki defense clown.
Easy to prove your ass wrong as usual. Alber's Lunarian defense is not even close to Emperors Haki defense.