You did, multiple times. Sorry mate..



There is no consensus on the notion of terrorism in international rights. In reality terrorism is a term that can be used by any categories of power to deligitimate actions of resistances or to condamn crimes. What Hamas did is a war crime, its how the international right defines what happened and this is this terminology that can allow the international agencies to attack the authors of the crimes in justice.



lol



No, just horrible gov, stopping their humanitary supply to people in distress



Not even remotely communist lol
Hamas is funded by Qatar and Iran they are pretty much terrorist .

Just like Mujahuddin were funded by USA during Afghan war .
 
hamas is a terrorist group. terrorism isnt always bad, but it CERTAINLY is in the case of hamas' actions and goals. regardless, what theyve done and are capable of doing pales in comparison to israels campaign of unambiguous allout genocide against the palestinian people.
 
what in specific are you referring to
Both your previous post and some others in this thread. I tried to read it but I was impressed with the mental gymnastics to justify the killing of Jews.

If I used some of the arguments people in here used in other settings I would be banned for hate speech. But if it is against Jews is alright. Then, after reading my post, some myopitic retard will answer with something like ''I don't hate Jews, I just think that Hamas is justified in killing them because of what some other people did.'' or some variation of the fact that Palestinians killing Jews is alright but Jews killing Palestinians isn't.

If I said: I think Americans should let terrorists kill them because of the crimes they did in the middle east (and there was plenty of crimes to take note), it is extremist. If I said: I think all transgenders abominations should be killed because some abuse their stupid ideology to brainwash kids, it is extremist. If I say: Hamas is justified in what they did and do because of what some politicians in Israel did/are doing, this is fine.

But that's ok. Take it as a rant of a fascist like I was called before and move on.
 
Both your previous post and some others in this thread. I tried to read it but I was impressed with the mental gymnastics to justify the killing of Jews.

If I used some of the arguments people in here used in other settings I would be banned for hate speech. But if it is against Jews is alright. Then, after reading my post, some myopitic retard will answer with something like ''I don't hate Jews, I just think that Hamas is justified in killing them because of what some other people did.'' or some variation of the fact that Palestinians killing Jews is alright but Jews killing Palestinians isn't.

If I said: I think Americans should let terrorists kill them because of the crimes they did in the middle east (and there was plenty of crimes to take note), it is extremist. If I said: I think all transgenders abominations should be killed because some abuse their stupid ideology to brainwash kids, it is extremist. If I say: Hamas is justified in what they did and do because of what some politicians in Israel did/are doing, this is fine.

But that's ok. Take it as a rant of a fascist like I was called before and move on.
when did i defend hamas
Post automatically merged:

when did i defend hamas
and israel slaughtering civilians in palestine is not protecting israelis.
Post automatically merged:

defending israel for genociding palestinians is fucked up. hamas being evil has nothing to do with this. israel is targeting civilians not hamas.
Post automatically merged:

if hamas suddenly got the same amount of power as israel, they would do far worse than what israel is currently doing, but thats not the situation happening right now.
 
Last edited:
when did i defend hamas
Post automatically merged:


and israel slaughtering civilians in palestine is not protecting israelis.
Post automatically merged:

defending israel for genociding palestinians is fucked up. hamas being evil has nothing to do with this. israel is targeting civilians not hamas.
Post automatically merged:

if hamas suddenly got the same amount of power as israel, they would do far worse than what israel is currently doing, but thats not the situation happening right now.
It was a rhetorical question?

Are you truly able to look at your own words and not see? Funny
 
Both your previous post and some others in this thread. I tried to read it but I was impressed with the mental gymnastics to justify the killing of Jews.

If I used some of the arguments people in here used in other settings I would be banned for hate speech. But if it is against Jews is alright. Then, after reading my post, some myopitic retard will answer with something like ''I don't hate Jews, I just think that Hamas is justified in killing them because of what some other people did.'' or some variation of the fact that Palestinians killing Jews is alright but Jews killing Palestinians isn't.

If I said: I think Americans should let terrorists kill them because of the crimes they did in the middle east (and there was plenty of crimes to take note), it is extremist. If I said: I think all transgenders abominations should be killed because some abuse their stupid ideology to brainwash kids, it is extremist. If I say: Hamas is justified in what they did and do because of what some politicians in Israel did/are doing, this is fine.

But that's ok. Take it as a rant of a fascist like I was called before and move on.
Your government literally justifies the killing of civillians solely because they're Palestinian Muslims, under the guise of "we must save them"...by bombing their refugee camps

You drank the IDF kool aid and read currated media, that's all there is to it
 
Top