Again, try to think before you answer. The example is directly correlated with Hamas claiming that they are right in their actions because of the crimes of Israel. The correlation is Hamas Vs Israel and not whatever stupid idea you have.
Still no, the example is not supposed to be a 1 for 1 comparison to the hamas israel conflict but to make you understand that because it preferable to listen to the victims rather than the oppressors in any conflict. So stop the fallacy please.
The scenario what I was talking about was people defending Hamas while ignoring it's crimes while at the same time blaming Israel and taking everything that justifies the killing of jews as fact.
There are no such people here. You are fighting windmills.
I complained about people justifying the killing of jews because of acts commit by some people, while ignoring atrocities of Hamas and using anything to make the group as a whole free of guilt.
Again, no one is doing that here and in reality very few people are doing that.
Like this. The opressor deserve to be killed.
No, it just need to be accountable for what it does.
Nope. I'm tired of trying to explain a simple concept to a person that claims to be a adult and this person acting like a retard.
Damn... try to act less toxic, maybe you might come across more understandable.
Apparently yes since I will be directly impacted by the usage of AI, and I'm not the only one.
if those people are afraid to be made obsolete, they should start to trying to improve instead of complaining
And this is why you will not (at least not now) understand why we call you a far right elitist. This is the kind of inhuman sentence that pro capitalist conservatist who don't know a thing about the struggles of finding a new job tends to say.
Plenty of people are preparing to the new scenario, the ones that won't will suffer because they are dumb
And here it is... pure dumb social darwinism... Those who can't adapt are therefore "dumb".... and you don't understand why people think you are elitist, inhuman and completely ignorant ?
No wonder...
In the end, society will adapt.
To people yes, not the opposite.
Competent people are already adapting.
Wrong.
Most artist are competent. In fact more than any tech AI so called "artist" and yet, they don't want to adapt (for good reasons). Meaning that you are wrong here.
You look at people complaining about AI
Not just some people,
the entire artistic industry mate.
I look at the people looking at SORA and asking about courses and how to use the technology
Those people will be using and teaching about a tool build on theft...
Once we will remove their data base (that is the propriety of the owners of the datas) there will be nothing left.
If you want to use such a tool, first understand how reality work and how to make art, then create art, then train your AI on YOUR art, and then maybe you will be able to create things efficiently and ethically.
If you only take the product as it is, you will create nothing but a prompt. A prompt that anyone can copy to recreate the same exact thing.
The first group will suffer, the second will improve and create new industries.
There won't be a "second group". Trust me that artist won't let people like you steel their work and they will all unite to take those database taht AI tools are trained on, DOWN.
Attack the argument and not the person
In that case, the point is to attack your vision of politic so its a perfectly legitimate point to make. Your vision is a libertarian one, a inhuman one and a pro capitalistic one on top of being elitist, so plainly far right. I'm just calling you out here for what you stand for.
If I start with personal attacks you know that there's way more ammunition against you.
You can try mate. I'm proud of my values. You are not.
Unless they are wastes of space
See.. once again.. inhumanity.
Ethic in progress is bullshit ? Damn... I'm glad you are not in the gov right now. You are clearly dangerous mate.
Progress will happen either you like or not
Actually no. This is a fallacy to think that society will eventually lead toward more progress. In reality, it can retrograde.
Change is inevitable. Progress is not.
Humans are better than you think.
Yes, I fully know and believe that. But looking at you and how you can be inhuman, I also know that there are some iffy people out there. So we must be careful and stay ethical.
Again, you are using fake accusations when not having a argument. Instead of bullshit use a proper argument.
I'm just reflecting what you are telling me mate. You are saying inhuman BS therefore I call you out on this.
AI changes will mostly affect people with higher education and not the large amount of society at large
Actually AI will touch every strat of the society. No just people with higher education.
Supposedly those people have average levels of intelligence
wow...
The best will adapt and lead the pack
Pure elitist and ignorant capitalist mindset...
People like you are precisely why society is failing everyone right now.
Assuming that people will have to change or adapt to pay the bills is not delusion
Forcing million of people to adapt or die and think that this will create a better society IS the desillusion. What it will create is a global revolution and you will be in the front line facing those who you deemed "incapable of adptating" and "waste of space"
Have fun surviving that.
people will adapt or die.
OR.... make a revolution.
Which is about to happen if there is no regulation and a profusion of AI usage in different industries.
Oh ... but I thought about it mate. That's why I say... be careful of what you say about people not adapting being "waste of space" because those people won't forget.