Still no, the example is not supposed to be a 1 for 1 comparison to the hamas israel conflict but to make you understand that because it preferable to listen to the victims rather than the oppressors in any conflict. So stop the fallacy please.
If you are a terrorist apologizer, yes.
There are no such people here. You are fighting windmills
You are one.
No, it just need to be accountable for what it does.
The ones that cause the suffering need to be accountable, the killing of innocent families is not accountability.
And here it is... pure dumb social darwinism... Those who can't adapt are therefore "dumb".... and you don't understand why people think you are elitist, inhuman and completely ignorant ?
Yeah, yeah. The opinion of a loser that is know as a waste of space incapable of seeing beyond his own ass is so important.
Most artist are competent. In fact more than any tech AI so called "artist" and yet, they don't want to adapt (for good reasons). Meaning that you are wrong here.
If they are competent, they will find work. Simple like that. If they are unable to appeal with their art, their art is shit.
And this is why you will not (at least not now) understand why we call you a far right elitist. This is the kind of inhuman sentence that pro capitalist conservatist who don't know a thing about the struggles of finding a new job tends to say.
I doubt that you worked in as many jobs as I did. Because I literally worked my ass of to get what I have. People that grew with me did the same. You are a incredible privileged person complaining online because of gov aid. Start working before calling people out.
To people yes, not the opposite.
Society as a whole.
Not just some people, the entire artistic industry mate.
Ok, let me correct myself: some people and a bunch of abominations.
Better?
If you only take the product as it is, you will create nothing but a prompt. A prompt that anyone can copy to recreate the same exact thing.
And if some people are stupid enough to be unable to do so, they need to search for other jobs.
There won't be a "second group". Trust me that artist won't let people like you steel their work and they will all unite to take those database taht AI tools are trained on, DOWN.
Doubtful. Unlike you, I already saw a industrial revolution and the end result is that those old professions faded out and the new ones took their place. People adapted.
In that case, the point is to attack your vision of politic so its a perfectly legitimate point to make.
Wrong. I see your vision as stupid and complete lacking in basic knowledge of reality. It was nothing to do with the argument itself. Again, attack the argument itself and not the person. I don't expect much from you but following basic directions should be possible.
Ethic in progress is bullshit ? Damn... I'm glad you are not in the gov right now. You are clearly dangerous mate.
The argument is bullshit because it lacks basic awareness. To claim that a society does not have ethics is the same as ignoring reality itsef. This is just some bullshit that leftists think are profound but in the end is worthless shit. Like most of the things you say.
Yes, I fully know and believe that. But looking at you and how you can be inhuman, I also know that there are some iffy people out there. So we must be careful and stay ethical.
Apparently not since you want to put humans in a cage and regulate everything because of your stupid ideas that aren't rooted in anything besides fear of the unknow. Humanity don't need those pathetics beings like you.
I'm just reflecting what you are telling me mate. You are saying inhuman BS therefore I call you out on this.
Yeah, yeah. Youy aren't reflecting on anything. You just dismiss anything that don't fit your point of view and try to get the high ground. Unfortunatelly, you fail to even understand a basic example.
Yeah. I think they should be smarter than you.
Pure elitist and ignorant capitalist mindset...
People like you are precisely why society is failing everyone right now.
The things that are failing society are mostly woke bullshit, so no. BTW, preaching is not a argument.
Forcing million of people to adapt or die and think that this will create a better society IS the desillusion. What it will create is a global revolution and you will be in the front line facing those who you deemed "incapable of adptating" and "waste of space"

Have fun surviving that.
This is stupid alarmist. This happened before and will happen again. Lazy fuck ups that only know how to complain in twitter will not be revolutionaries.
OR.... make a revolution.

Which is about to happen if there is no regulation and a profusion of AI usage in different industries.
Nope. Alarmist tactic of a lazy fuck that is not willing to put the work to improve.
Oh ... but I thought about it mate. That's why I say... be careful of what you say about people not adapting being "waste of space" because those people won't forget.
Yeah. Threats of stupid fuck ups are not scary.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If that was true you wouldn't have born.
If you're gonna drop zingers left and right, at least have the decency to have proper syntax. This insult is the perfect encapsulation of your lack of analytical skills and very surface level interpretation of world events and geopolitics. You play fast and lose with the definition of "genocide" or "terrorism" in order to fit your narrative. You interpret the actions of hamas as terrorist in nature (which I agree with), but you don't apply the same standard for Israel.

I can tell you're extremely young and susceptible to propaganda, truly pathetic.
 

Uncle Van

Monké Don't Do Taxes
Random question of the day: Can we truly trust charities created for humanitarian aid by large scale corporations and/or our governments to keep their word, and do we truly know where all of that billions in donations money gets distributed to?

When someone donates to you double or triple digits, it's most likely a gesture of friendship or goodwill.

When a conglomerate donates to you at least seven digits worth, they're pretty clear in sending you a message that you owe them a favour (or two, or forever).
[automerge]1708374502[/automerge]
Hope your auto merge works but WTF?
At 0:30 in the vid.

Even the Truckers Convoy never made it this far. They never broke into the House of Commons unlike these fellows.
I don't donate to charity since 70% to 80% of whatever is donated goes to the people sponsoring it instead of the people in need. For every $100 you give, those who suffer would only receive 30% max. Better to buy the supplies to send it to them directly.
 
H

Herrera95

If you're gonna drop zingers left and right, at least have the decency to have proper syntax. This insult is the perfect encapsulation of your lack of analytical skills and very surface level interpretation of world events and geopolitics. You play fast and lose with the definition of "genocide" or "terrorism" in order to fit your narrative. You interpret the actions of hamas as terrorist in nature (which I agree with), but you don't apply the same standard for Israel.

I can tell you're extremely young and susceptible to propaganda, truly pathetic.
Dude call me virgin and then wants to complain that got disrespect.
 

Uncle Van

Monké Don't Do Taxes
It's Presidents Day, and a group of scholars released their yearly ranking of U.S. Presidents.
1. Abraham Lincoln
2. FD Roosevelt
3. George Washington
4. Teddy Roosevelt
5. Thomas Jefferson
6. Harry Truman
7. Barack Obama
8. Dwight Eisenhower
9. Lyndon Johnson
10. John F. Kennedy
11. James Madison
12. Bill Clinton
13. John Adams
14. Joe Biden
15. Woodrow Wilson
16. Ronald Reagan
17. Ulysses Grant
18. James Monroe
19. George H.W Bush(2001)
20. John Quincy Adams(John Adam's son)
21. Andrew Jackson
22. Jimmy Carter
23. William Taft
24. William McKinley
25. James Polk
26. Grover Cleveland
27. Ford
28. Martin Van Buren
29. Rutherford Hayes
30. James Garfield
31. Benjamin Harrison
32. George W. Bush(1989)
33. Chester Arthur
34. Calvin Coolidge
35. Richard Nixon
36. Herbert Hoover
37. John Tyler
38. Zachary Taylor
39. Millard Fillmore
40. Warren G. Harding
41. William Henry Harrison
42. Franklin Pierce
43. Andrew Johnson
44. James Buchanan
45. Donald Trump
List is pretty trash imo. Recency bias is strong among other things.
 

Uncle Van

Monké Don't Do Taxes
I agree with the top 2. I'd say FDR is top 1.
FDR was so effective that everyone allowed him to break the rules and serve more than two terms lol. Died during his 4th.

They placed Biden at 14 when the old man shouldn't even be on the list. His first term ain't finished yet. And ain't no way Trump is worse than dudes who plunged the country into a civil war, caused a great depression, allowed the passing of Jim Crow laws, tried undoing anti-slavery legislation etc..
 
FDR was so effective that everyone allowed him to break the rules and serve more than two terms lol. Died during his 4th.

They placed Biden at 14 when the old man shouldn't even be on the list. His first term ain't finished yet. And ain't no way Trump is worse than dudes who plunged the country into a civil war, caused a great depression, allowed the passing of Jim Crow laws, tried undoing anti-slavery legislation etc..
I'm aware, but there were no term limits back in the day, they implemented them because he couldn't stop winning. As for Trump and Biden, I'd say we'd have to wait a couple of decades in order to be more objective. Neither of them are good tho.
 

Uncle Van

Monké Don't Do Taxes
I'm aware, but there were no term limits back in the day, they implemented them because he couldn't stop winning. As for Trump and Biden, I'd say we'd have to wait a couple of decades in order to be more objective. Neither of them are good tho.
Many presidents didn't run for a 3rd term because George Washington set the standard for a 2-term limit by humbly rejecting a 3rd time. Going for anything more than 2 was seen as arrogant and greedy. Didn't stop Teddy from trying through lol
[automerge]1708392736[/automerge]
Did they discuss the data they used? It wasn't by effective policy or approval ratings.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Presidents/s/9ynEIF9pt2

As usual, judge for yourself
 
Top