That's a silly argument.
Photography took away from skilled humans, Cinematography too.
Printing took away from skilled humans.
The invention of any piece of technology made humans obsolete.
I said to a certain extent iirc. You cannot like my argument, idc I'm to busy to go into specifics... but AI can be useful just as well. I'm just saying that going to far with it is not right.
 
I said to a certain extent iirc. You cannot like my argument, idc I'm to busy to go into specifics... but AI can be useful just as well. I'm just saying that going to far with it is not right.
Without specifics and "too far", if you make a point make it clear, because this vagueness means nothing.
Too much medicine is bad.. Everything in excess is bad, no shit.
Post automatically merged:

and its fine if humans are made obsolete. eventually we will just need to give out UBI though
Did Photography make painting disappear?
Humans will still be the initiators of the operas, and AI, just like a pen, a tool.
 
I can agree with some of your post, but are paintings as popular as they used to be though ?
Do we have patrons that pay people to do nothing but paint under their tutelage?
We forget that the art that we see today in museums is not a randos that did it after he worked in the mill in 99 cases over a 100, but millionaire artists paid by billionaires. Popes, Rich families and so on, at least for the start.
When art started becoming more "figurative" it started to become more approachable to the masses for a thousand reasons.
But all the reinassance and most of the most famous work of arts made by humankind, were made under tutelage.
 
Do we have patrons that pay people to do nothing but paint under their tutelage?
We forget that the art that we see today in museums is not a randos that did it after he worked in the mill in 99 cases over a 100, but millionaire artists paid by billionaires. Popes, Rich families and so on, at least for the start.
When art started becoming more "figurative" it started to become more approachable to the masses for a thousand reasons.
But all the reinassance and most of the most famous work of arts made by humankind, were made under tutelage.
Millionaire artists lmfao

And your post doesn’t answer my question that is « are paintings really as huge as they were before the industrialisation of cameras »
 
There are concerns in the writing community about AI. Not too long ago KDP set rules to help fight against it. The market is being flooded with low content and even novels created by AI. They set rules where you have to identify if you used AI in creation. Book cover creators have taken a hit because so many people are opting to use AI-created covers instead of paying a person to create one for them.

In general, the products by AI aren't as well created or written as that of people, but it still causes an issue because of the massive amount flooding the industry. It's hard to find a great creation of a person when no one is going through hundreds of published works to find legit authors.

I can't predict the future, but in the short term, AI seems to hurt people and the act of creation overall.
It hurts the audience too. We have already gone from active to passive art consumption decades ago and now commercialization removed the creative act even on the side of the creator. Ai art is going to be even more life- and soulless than the gazillion stories on the market that are solely produced for making money. In a way ai art is just a logical continuation of what we've been doing for the past decades through movies and TV or maybe even earlier.
 
Last edited:
Millionaire artists lmfao

And your post doesn’t answer my question that is « are paintings really as huge as they were before the industrialisation of cameras »
Art will make a great comeback but in current digital age it’s tough time to be artist .

I don’t think we will have like Picasso or such in near future in the current world if you don’t do 9-5 job you will end up homeless/broke.
 
I used GPT-4 and Gemini , AI has long way to go especially I can’t really use Chaptgpt in myworkplace where critical based systems are used .


GPT 4 doesn’t follow ethics and standard it can be harmful if used in critical system like Automobile or healthcare .
We don't need ai to make unethical decisions in healthcare, greedy humans are doing just fine:suresure:

That's a silly argument.

Photography took away from skilled humans, Cinematography too.

Printing took away from skilled humans.

The invention of any piece of technology made humans obsolete.
When humans are obsolete in society then what do we even do? How do we live? Are we supposed to live at all when we're "obsolete"? What value do our lives have when we're "obsolete"?! What are we still good for and who decides it?
Post automatically merged:

Art will make a great comeback but in current digital age it’s tough time to be artist .

I don’t think we will have like Picasso or such in near future in the current world if you don’t do 9-5 job you will end up homeless/broke.
The only way to defeat ai is the destruction of current society or at least all vital servers have to go down and energy supply has to be cut off.
 

Zemmi

GodMommie
It hurts the audience too. We have already gone from active to passive art consumption decades ago and now commercialization removed the creative act even on the side of the creator. Ai art is going to be even more life- and soulless than the gazillion stories on the market that are solely produced for making money. In a way ai art is just a logical continuation of what we've been doing for the past decades through movies and TV or maybe even earlier.
I think it was amazon/audible, but they are working up something where they will turn your book into an audiobook with AI technology.
 

Zemmi

GodMommie
After stopping to teach writing, schools will stop teaching how to read too 🤩
We are already on that decline. Besides the religion-based private schools around here, they stopped teaching cursive writing.

There's a trend towards just passing them. That's why we have children graduating and can't read above the fourth-grade level. Which is also a discussion in the writer community. Once people aimed to write at least the seventh/eighth-grade level, but that level has been decreasing in recent times to make it more accessible to a broader audience.
 
We are already on that decline. Besides the religion-based private schools around here, they stopped teaching cursive writing.

There's a trend towards just passing them. That's why we have children graduating and can't read above the fourth-grade level. Which is also a discussion in the writer community. Once people aimed to write at least the seventh/eighth-grade level, but that level has been decreasing in recent times to make it more accessible to a broader audience.
What do you mean ? It was a serious post. I mean didn’t Sweden stop teaching how to write ?
 
H

Herrera95

Said who ? Your facebook friend ?
Do you have actual statistics to say that ?
Do you?


No it doesn't, I already gave example where its not the case. Its a pure belief. Its close to cultism to believe that technology only improves lives.

While it can do it, it doesn't necessaraly do it. Sometimes, if not regulated enough, it does the opposite. Repeating a lie twice won't make it true mate.
It always does. You failed to give any example of that.


I think you are confusing a lot of subject and not understanding why people are poor and staying poor in the first place.

Try to ask yourself that question before you go further because right now, you are completely lost in ignorant libertarian propaganda.
You for sure are the one who doesn't understand why poverty happens.

All I'm saying is that technology will improve productivity therefore lowering prices and allowing poor people to have more things. For example phones that were once in the past something only a few very rich people had now it is accessible to everyone. Thanks to technology improvement. And that caused many jobs towards the old telephone system to be extinct without people remaining in that area.
 
After stopping to teach writing, schools will stop teaching how to read too 🤩
When I was in elementary my mom would always complain that school doesn't teach us as much creative writing as they used to in her generation. To think that school will ever stop to teach HANDwriting is outright dystopian.
There's a trend towards just passing them. That's why we have children graduating and can't read above the fourth-grade level. Which is also a discussion in the writer community. Once people aimed to write at least the seventh/eighth-grade level, but that level has been decreasing in recent times to make it more accessible to a broader audience.
No wonder I lost all enthusiasm for books when I was around 12/13 years🤡
What do you mean ? It was a serious post. I mean didn’t Sweden stop teaching how to write ?
In Germany they stopped teaching how to spell properly. I'm not kidding, they introduced a new teaching method that lets kids write like they want and teach them spelling much later. Teachers were told not to correct spelling mistakes or even make suggestion such as "take a look at this word again". I was doing an internship in an elementary school 10+ years ago and I was shocked. Idk if anything changed since then but reading all these news articles about the decline of the education system my hope is non existent.
 
Top