Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine are you having fun al? are you having van al? dei must go gaolang > your fav is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? life goal sister harem real madrid reloaded is innocent tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you watch for haters weebs discussing politics lmao worst thread ever
I said I wasn't a fan of Trump because of his mouth. I praised his financial policies and the fact I believe these two main conflicts wouldn't be happening if anyone was in the white house but Biden. But that somehow turned to I'm voting for Trump out of spite, when no I'm voting for him because he had really good financial policy that let me live decently.
Technically it has been implied several times mostly directed to me 
Posts that imply I'm delusional, biased or somehow misguided for voting for the choice that makes life easier for me. Despite me knowing exactly how life has been for me under each person and which one was far better.
Posts that imply I'm delusional, biased or somehow misguided for voting for the choice that makes life easier for me. Despite me knowing exactly how life has been for me under each person and which one was far better.
Then you went on some kind thing saying my words meant things they certainly did not. You said I wanted to throw bombs at people, you said I supported terrorists. You even said I supported Americans when they went after people unjustly, when I most certainly did not do that. In fact I despise those actions, that I know America has taken because the bushes, obama and Biden they are all like that. They profit even on personal levels from it by stocks in defense, traditional republicans are far from innocent of this because they played that game too. Which if you look at the oil production in the US under Trump, I don't think he's the same, but if he proves me wrong on that. I will be the first to say it.
I did not. It was a rhetoric question 
Trump the business man cut taxes on the rich so that they can expand and create more jobs. Expansion means more need for workers, so companies had to compete with each other by raising wages. Trump made up for the lack of corporate tax money but having the Federal Reserve Bank print more dollars to fund his domestic and foreign policies. This lead to slow growing inflation. The Federal Reserve Bank wanted to increase interest rates to slow the economy in 2019, but Trump strong-armed them into postponing because the election was 1 year away and needed the economy to look good. Of course covid happened in 2020 and Trump made the Federal Reserve Bank print trillions of dollars to bail out companies. By late 2021, inflation was out of control and the FRB finally started increasing rates.
Biden took over an unstable economy so the inflation isn't his fault. Right now the Biden administration is strong-arming the FRB to give good news to keep the economy pumping until the election. The economy is wonky as fuck right now.
Biden took over an unstable economy so the inflation isn't his fault. Right now the Biden administration is strong-arming the FRB to give good news to keep the economy pumping until the election. The economy is wonky as fuck right now.
Zemmi the problem is the overarching political system that forces people in these kind of dead end thoughts creating a plague vs cholera situation where both parties are pure shit. Ofc nobody can blame you for detesting a president under whose reign policies were made that made your life hard but voting the opposite out of spite instead is not going to make society better. ofc you can vote for whomever you want
And it's also to be expected that ppl who don't live in the US are going to judge US presidents bases on their effect on world politics.
Bruh you are literally describing yourself here.
Some social media influencers should start a joke presidential campaign with a joke candidate and make it go viral. If they do it right their candidate wins and thus ending the 2 party system once and for all.
And it's also to be expected that ppl who don't live in the US are going to judge US presidents bases on their effect on world politics.Bruh you are literally describing yourself here.
Some social media influencers should start a joke presidential campaign with a joke candidate and make it go viral. If they do it right their candidate wins and thus ending the 2 party system once and for all.
I would say restrict financial spending there is absolute money power that keeps 2 party infrastructure alive so far .
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-election/dnc-war-third-party-candidates-rcna143290
This is an example of why 3rd party candidates will never be a functional thing. The DNC sees Kennedy as an actual threat and they plan to go on the verbal attack of him as well, and file lawsuits. This backs what I have been saying, I believe democrats are politicizing the law system to go after their political challengers.
This is an example of why 3rd party candidates will never be a functional thing. The DNC sees Kennedy as an actual threat and they plan to go on the verbal attack of him as well, and file lawsuits. This backs what I have been saying, I believe democrats are politicizing the law system to go after their political challengers.