Who will be the 47th President of the United States of America?


  • Total voters
    15
  • Poll closed .
From a leftist saying : "Trans rights"

Here is what will happen in rightist circles and in this thread if not stopped (by people like me):

- "Trans are in movies now everywhere "(they just saw one in one serie)
Not gonna complain about this one but it’s somewhat true though. Not everywhere, but the representation has greatly increased in the last years. It’s so so far from being « one in one TV series »
 
They said trans right, trans are unatural"
Even if it would be true that trans are unnatural, appeal to nature is a fallacy anyway
Post automatically merged:

Here is what will happen in rightist circles and in this thread if not stopped (by people like me):

- "They said trans right, trans are unatural"
- "Trans are in movies now everywhere "(they just saw one in one serie)
- "They want to force us to accept their ideology"
- "Media are forcing us leftist narrative"
- "Leftist don't accept critics, leftist are woke"
- "Woke people want to force trans ideology in schools"
- "Woke want to sexualise children"
- "They want to teach sex to children"
- "They want to transform children into trans"
- "Media want to force sexual trans ideology on children"
- "Media want to promotes pedophilia"
- "Trans are pedophile"
- "We should ban trans ideology from school"
- "We should ban trans ideology from university"
- "We should ban trans self care from psychiatry"
- "We should ban trans people from public spaces"
- "We should ban trans people"
- "We should k......."
Also generalization much
 
Last edited:
Not all rich people have those things.
Indeed, not all rich people have this. Rich people sometimes have other things.


Not gonna complain about this one but it’s somewhat true though. Not everywhere, but the representation has greatly increased in the last years. It’s so so far from being « one in one TV series »
One PER serie is still far from being "everywhere" lol.


Even if it would be true that trans are unnatural, appeal to nature is a fallacy anyway
Indeed, that what most rightist relies on : fallacies myth and biases.


Also generalization much
Oh no.. really... not at all.. I'm actually being quite nice here. Sometimes there are not all those step, it going directly to the last step. I think you don't understand just how far goes the anti-trans agenda.
 
Absolutely not what I was doing. I listed things I wanted that I couldn't afford and was making an extreme example that most theft isn't people the person is in need, but because they want something. I don't like when excuses are made for people who rob people. Or excuses for crimes in general especially when they cause harm to others.
as someone who came from a low income area I am pretty confident in saying most people who steal aren't doing it to pay for their bills or food
 

TheAncientCenturion

I will never forgive Oda
‎‎‎
The Cherokee also spoke Irish before they met the Irish.
That’s really interesting considering how the Irish language has been on a pretty consistent decline since the English set foot in the Pale. Got anything I can read on that?

Source: Christian white supremacists (as well as some brainwashed natives themselves:saden: )
Oh it was another dumb Solis post, nevermind
 
as someone who came from a low income area I am pretty confident in saying most people who steal aren't doing it to pay for their bills or food
Indeed, we are lucky that in occidental area, cultural and social capitals are enabling the push of legal action to survive rather than the opposite.
 
For french people here:


Its a video - from an independant media - explaining the problematic siding of big french channels and journals with the politic of Israelian far right propaganda. Sadly, there is no translation and this is really bad because we are starting to make very high quality political content in France.. I hope it will change.
 
I mean it felt outta context :suresure:
On the contrary. Its right in the subject matter. With good social, economical and cultural capital for all, there would mostly be no problems of crimes. But that's not the case.


Dude, he's trying to tell you you don't know how to write.
My sentence was in (mostly) correct english. Don't worry about that.

But the sociological context needs to be understood for the comprehension of the sentence.

------

On another subject. New atheism and Dawkins "antireligious" status being actually... the anti-Islam status:


Strange..
 
Last edited:
Top