They are otherwise, it's just removed in that one particular street/neighbourhood because of the context. Theres not gonna be campaigns now to remove all u-turn signs from american streets, tho i wouldn't be surprised if a few from a certain political spectrum were already crying about this supposedly happening.
Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine #votebluenomatterwhat are you having fun al? are you having van al? gaolang > your fav i refuse to pay my taxes imagine thinking trump is the good guy is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? it's over for trump life goal sister harem loli mfw kamala harris can actually win real madrid tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you worst thread ever
They are otherwise, it's just removed in that one particular street/neighbourhood because of the context. Theres not gonna be campaigns now to remove all u-turn signs from american streets, tho i wouldn't be surprised if a few from a certain political spectrum were already crying about this supposedly happening.
i neg diffed your mom the other day
nah its all fun and games
To be honest,i only care about my tribe nowadays. If Japan,Europe or whoever has xyz problems,fuck them. Its none of my business.
Israel has a cultural element to this. Lots of more religous jews have like 5+ kids and live off government aid.
You keep jacking off to loli hentai and you might just end up like Nobuhiro Watsuki.
Post automatically merged:
nah its all fun and games
Post automatically merged:
To be honest,i only care about my tribe nowadays. If Japan,Europe or whoever has xyz problems,fuck them. Its none of my business.
Post automatically merged:
Israel has a cultural element to this. Lots of more religous jews have like 5+ kids and live off government aid.
Post automatically merged:
You keep jacking off to loli hentai and you might just end up like Nobuhiro Watsuki.
Last edited:
H
Only oppai loli
I've heard studies claiming that US should maintain a sustainable population even around 2100's while Europe and Asia should shrink tremendously and Africa, South America should keep growing (nothing crazy like China and India). But of course this can change based on what happens during the following years.
I don't fully understand the "problem" of birth rate unless your country has a pyramid scheme like retirement like Brazil has which consists on young employed people to pay for the retirement of the eldery. So if population shrinks this system collapses (is already like that because of corruption as well) and since people live longer and longer we also have to increase the age they can retire.
I've also heard of some governament "projects" to make population to have more babies like in Japan sending the ones turning 18 into a cruise so they can fuck and get pregnant. Lol.
I don't believe one method alone would be enough to make people having more babies again and the population stop to shrink but what I believe would help is: Increase safety since no one wanna have babies in a place you can die any day by getting robbed or something, increase economy since babies are expensive, increase freedom so people can be themselves (specially stop trying to force men to be femine and woman to be masculine) and also so we can have, not sure how to write this in english, but birth service from woman that become pregnant for couples that can't on their own.
Post automatically merged:
I've heard studies claiming that US should maintain a sustainable population even around 2100's while Europe and Asia should shrink tremendously and Africa, South America should keep growing (nothing crazy like China and India). But of course this can change based on what happens during the following years.
I don't fully understand the "problem" of birth rate unless your country has a pyramid scheme like retirement like Brazil has which consists on young employed people to pay for the retirement of the eldery. So if population shrinks this system collapses (is already like that because of corruption as well) and since people live longer and longer we also have to increase the age they can retire.
I've also heard of some governament "projects" to make population to have more babies like in Japan sending the ones turning 18 into a cruise so they can fuck and get pregnant. Lol.
I don't believe one method alone would be enough to make people having more babies again and the population stop to shrink but what I believe would help is: Increase safety since no one wanna have babies in a place you can die any day by getting robbed or something, increase economy since babies are expensive, increase freedom so people can be themselves (specially stop trying to force men to be femine and woman to be masculine) and also so we can have, not sure how to write this in english, but birth service from woman that become pregnant for couples that can't on their own.
Last edited by a moderator:
This is a self reinforcing loop though: More people -> Scarce Resources -> Resource Wars -> Side with more people / quantity wins resource war.
Malthus already theorized in 1798 that the population can not grow once a resource limit is breached. The Industrial revolution allowed for huge growth powered by innovation we live in at the moment counter to his predictions. Once innovation slows down the curse of limited resources will lead to resource wars again and we would enter the loop again. I agree that this is cursed, but that seems to be reality.
Most industrialized countries have such a Pyramid scheme (Germany, Japan, France ...) only exception I know is Israel with a high birth rate. US population growth is driven by immigration as their birth rate is below replacement. Interesting Brazil got old before it got wealthy, similar to China and North Korea. Is that also the case for Argentina?
I guess population growth and decline are exponential processes like f(x) = 2^x for growing population or f(x) = 2^(-x) for shrinking population -- and humans are bad understanding non linear things. Which makes it very hard to balance between the two kind of Pyramid schemes: Exponential growth/decline.
South Korea and Japan are low crime, high safety societies but still have very low birth rates smh. Meanwhile the unsafe poor countries at (civil) war have the high birth rates (Syria, Myanmar, Iraq etc.) ... why? Maybe because logic and education destroy birth rates?
Malthus already theorized in 1798 that the population can not grow once a resource limit is breached. The Industrial revolution allowed for huge growth powered by innovation we live in at the moment counter to his predictions. Once innovation slows down the curse of limited resources will lead to resource wars again and we would enter the loop again. I agree that this is cursed, but that seems to be reality.
Most industrialized countries have such a Pyramid scheme (Germany, Japan, France ...) only exception I know is Israel with a high birth rate. US population growth is driven by immigration as their birth rate is below replacement. Interesting Brazil got old before it got wealthy, similar to China and North Korea. Is that also the case for Argentina?
I guess population growth and decline are exponential processes like f(x) = 2^x for growing population or f(x) = 2^(-x) for shrinking population -- and humans are bad understanding non linear things. Which makes it very hard to balance between the two kind of Pyramid schemes: Exponential growth/decline.
South Korea and Japan are low crime, high safety societies but still have very low birth rates smh. Meanwhile the unsafe poor countries at (civil) war have the high birth rates (Syria, Myanmar, Iraq etc.) ... why? Maybe because logic and education destroy birth rates?
Aren't those muslims nations? doesnt Islam advocate for big families? Maybe birth rates are just cultural,bro. One of my grandpas had 11 kids and the other one had 5,its cool to have big families back in his day. Nowadays,people seem more interessed in having money to expend on frivolous shit than having kids. Different times,i guess...
@Okamakama does the police still adopt the policy of "shoot to kill" in case of suicide bombers.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shooting_of_Jean_Charles_de_Menezes
@Herrera95 i just googled what "oppai loli" stands for. This is some pedo shit. fack u.
Post automatically merged:
@Okamakama does the police still adopt the policy of "shoot to kill" in case of suicide bombers.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shooting_of_Jean_Charles_de_Menezes
Post automatically merged:
@Herrera95 i just googled what "oppai loli" stands for. This is some pedo shit. fack u.
Last edited:
Myanmar is not in top 20 and a Buddhist country that is so Anti-Islam they're genociding the Rohingya,
Benin is laizistic with 75% being christians or muslims, Uganda is evangelical christian, Angola, Liberia, Zambia, Mozambique, Burundi, Democratic Republic of Congo, Tanzania, Cameroon christian dominated. So no, not all the countries with still high fertility are Islamic.
Interestingly enough, tho not surprising Afghanistan is the only non-african country in the top 20 with the highest fertility.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/262884/countries-with-the-highest-fertility-rates/
Myanmar is at civil war, they are not only genociding Rohingya but also Christians (ethnic Karen who are christians) on their border with Thailand. The military Junta is basically at war with all the border states ethnic Militias, which have different Religions right now (Buddhist included).
Example for Myanmar civil war: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_1027
Example for Myanmar civil war: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_1027
H
Not sure about Argentina but things are much more complicated than simply birth rate and population charts. No one can prevent a disaster like the pandemic that we had for example. And then there is wars and other natural or human made disasters that influence on that. Also immigration (legal or not) can play a huge role in a country populaton size.
Like I said it is what I believe would HELP and are all of those things. Of course we know poor people have a lot of babies because they are careless and don't use condoms or other methods to avoid that, they may receive some governament benefit for having a baby while being poor (at least here in Brazil this is a case) and there is also some studies that suggest people in an unsafe environment tend to have more babies since they know many could die but at least increases the chances of at least one of them to carry on their genes and to keep humankind alive.
Those topics are much more complex than think one simple cause and one simple solution would be the answer.
Like I said it is what I believe would HELP and are all of those things. Of course we know poor people have a lot of babies because they are careless and don't use condoms or other methods to avoid that, they may receive some governament benefit for having a baby while being poor (at least here in Brazil this is a case) and there is also some studies that suggest people in an unsafe environment tend to have more babies since they know many could die but at least increases the chances of at least one of them to carry on their genes and to keep humankind alive.
Those topics are much more complex than think one simple cause and one simple solution would be the answer.
