Law can just probably cuts Zoro in half imo
I'm not rejecting the idea that Law may win
I'm rejecting the idea that "Law >> Zoro"
Two >> is simply a wrong assessment in my opinion
The way I see it is Law = Zoro
Both can win, depending on the plot
Law has DF advantage
Zoro has Haki/Stamina advantage
And both showcased similar feats of cutting a mountain range + they sliced through a full body armament. But each one did it with his own style, one with DF haxness, the other with Haki
And Law's fruit can be blocked if your haki was ON POINT like Doffy against Law, but you can be cut if you got careless like Vergo
Point is... It can go either way
and not only saying Law > Zoro
But Law >> Zoro
is going waaaay overboard